Taitz v Astrue - Rules Violations - Scathing Memorandum and Order from Judge Lamberth - Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Case - 7-25-2011
Taitz v Astrue - Order to Seal Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment - Possible Sanctions against Taitz - 7-25-2011
update: Things are not what they seem, I have a record of all the phone conversations with the DC court, as well as records of all the faxes and e-mails sent to them
Some employees of the DC court are lying to the judge. I kept record of all the phone calls, faxes and e-mails to the DC court and I have multiple witnesses as well. Some employee or employees of the DC court is/are lying and will be held accountable. On 07.21.2011 a fax was accepted in the DC court and was hand carried to the chambers of the chief judge. Sua sponte decision of the court on 07.21.2011 allowing me to resubmit the opposition was related to the fax received.
I will resubmit the opposition and memorandum in support of the opposition to motion for summary judgment yet again. It will be done today. Seal means, that you cannot see it on the electronic docket, but the documents are there and will be considered. The seal will be removed, hopefully tomorrow.
A lot is going on right now. Currently I am concentrating on doing everything I possibly can to inspect the original BC in HI and the original SSA application for Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama is fraudulently using. So far there is no formal opposition from HI and the Department of Justice did not file a reply to my opposition brief. Both Attorney General of HI and the US attorney for the District of Columbia are out of time to file. I am not sure what is the explanation for lack of opposition on their part: maybe, they think that the fix is in or maybe they are afraid to be prosecuted later for the obstruction of Justice and aiding and abetting the SSA fraud or maybe there is some technical glitch. Another legal action will be filed soon.
I will provide more information later. It also will be a part of my book, that will be coming out later. The book is tentatively titled “from the queen of the birthers. Secrets and intrigue behind the crime of the century” http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=24145
Taitz v Astrue - Rules Violations - Memorandum and Order from Judge Lamberth - 7/25/2011
Taitz v Astrue - Order to Seal Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment - 7/25/2011
76 comments:
The only person sabotaging her case is Orly. Is this some type of martyr complex?
Okay, so can someone to refile with the redacted numbers? Why she didn't file properly is puzzling. This just plays into their hand.
I think Orly is having trouble assimilating the English Language. English is not her native language. I think Orly would perform better in her native language. This mistake seems to be one where person is having trouble assimilating the language.
Orly has done this all along. Even when I was helping her collect evidence, I wondered who side she was on.
She won't listen to anyone. 100 times I have told her she is filing these things in the wrong court.
It's as plain as day who has jurisdiction over Obama. She will never get a federal court to rule on Obama.
Congress established the Superior Court of the District of Columbia as the trial court of general jurisdiction for the District of Columbia in 1970. The court consists of a chief judge and 61 associate judges. The court is assisted by the service of 24 magistrate judges as well as retired judges who have been recommended and approved as senior judges.
http://www.dccourts.gov/dccourts/superior/index.jsp
Barry's lawyers have been laughing at us for 3 years, due to this inability to follow simple rules.
@Arizona Patriot
I don't know if it matters, but anywhere Oscam has used his social security number he has committed fraud. The same holds for wherever he used his forged COLB.
@Arizona PatriotI think Orly is secretly working with Obama, much like Trump was in cahoots with the Usurper. Someone needs to investigate Orly pronto.
I get the feeling that Orly feels she can female talk and whine her way through these court proceedings. Maybe one can work their way through life like that in other countries but it cannot be done that way with the very strict procedures of the US court system. The courts of the US are not a boy - girl thing.
The real irony here is that Orly did not even have the last 4 digits, until Susan Daniels gave them to her, well over a year ago.
I wish Susan Daniels was a lawyer.
@Anonymous
"I think Orly is having trouble assimilating the English Language."
What's to assimulate? She knows what redacted means and she knows what the rule says xxx-xx-1234. It is that straight forward.
@Anonymous
It's a real puzzler when you consider this was her fourth attempt at correcting the same problem in this case alone.
She isn't having trouble with language; she did it wrong on purpose. When she filed the second copy she explained on her website all of the reasons why she couldn't do what the rules require her to do. This is the result. If she keeps this up, it will cost her another 20 grand.
Well crap, here we go again. Incompetance. I tried to tell her on her own blog that details matter in Court cases and she wouldn't even post my comments. I also told her to purchase a typewriter (they do still sell them) if she couldn't scan the documents, fill them in and print them. Badly handwritten crap looks like crap in a Court of law and especially one this important! Anyway, she has to know how to redact something if she refiled it correctly the first time. Damn!
Her incessant whining about how she can be required to redact numbers from a series that is NOT a SSN is ridiculous.
File the damned amended complaint with the proper numbers redacted. Do not stipulate that these numbers represent an actual valid SSN, at least not one assigned to O.B.A.M.A. (One Big Ass Mistake America)!
How hard can it be when all us common folk cans figure it out??
Orly is every bit as big an obot as Trump. She has to be doing this on purpose. It is impossible for licensed lawyer to be that stupid.
Someone needs to investigate. She has been taking our money for years and is a secret obot.
The evidence (EXHIBITS) Orly has submitted to the court has been redacted in two ways. One investigator redacted the Obama CONnecticut the first 6 social security numbers like this 042-68-XXXX, and the other investigator redacted the social security number the way the Fed rules specify XXX-XX-4425. I think Orly didn't want to tamper with the evidence by redacting the evidence as it was presented to her.
If the court dismisses the case on procedural grounds, Judge Lamberth should dismiss the case 'without prejudice' where Taitz may bring a "new" case again back into court. There may be a stipulation or two for the case to go forward in Lamberth's court. The first one is obviously by redacting the Obama CONn social security number as specified by the rule.
To me, it seems that Taitz does nor know what she is doing.
Federal rules have to be followed when you want to win a case in federal court. It's that simple.
But Taitz doesn't seem to understand that, to the detriment of the movement.
Who cares about the stupid rule, the whole world knows what the stolen ct id is now for the past 3 years. That is anyone who has been paying attention. Not much chance of anyone stealing Ofraud's identity is there Judge? Our courts are so fxxx'd up, just like congress and the media. Orly's motion asked why she needed to redact anything when the damn number was stolen in the first place in 1977. Ofraud's whole life is a lie.
And furthermore, Orly still has about 10 days left on the clock that Judge Lamberth gave her to resubmit her motion(s) following the rules specified. I believe the judge sees that Taitz has a solid case here, but she just has to bring it.
"Orly still has about 10 days left on the clock that Judge Lamberth gave her to resubmit her motion(s) following the rules specified."
Not according to his latest order where he's now DENIED that motion.
Incompetence or Agent Provocateur?
Both are equally inexcusable, IMO.
Personally, I don't think Orly is incompetent, I think she is very good at what she gets paid to do.
All these *ahem* lawyers that have failed to argue the successful disclosure of a record that has already been allegedly made public, TWICE...are very, very good at what they get paid to do.
Never piss off a Judge especially when you are SO ClOSE to getting what you want...Some one with some proficient legal experience needs to help out Dr. Taitz. and a team of paralegals would'nt hurt....
@Anonymous
"Not according to his latest order where he's now DENIED that motion."
Yes the motion for the 21st of July is denied. However, I'm not so certain that the case has ended. She still appears to have a chance to make right until the judge puts forth his summary judgment that favors the defendant which would end the case.
@MissTickly
Ah, Miss Tickly. Glad to see you here. If you ever have the time, please fill out the questionnaire located here:
http://www.bernardgoldberg.com/do-you-believe-in-the-devil-and-a-few-other-questions/
I have been citing your excellent research findings on the thread.
It's even more awesome to hear the Order read aloud. http://minus.com/mevuSZv
@MissTickly
P.S.
Some of the Obots are making false accusations about you and are trying to claim you're not credible. They also claim debossed seals are perfectly normal.
Army Colonel Lawrence Sellin, LTC Lakin, Maj Gen Vallely, Dr Amb Alan Keyes et al, are correct:
Not only is the truth coming out soon, but there will be enough Repubs along with the Dems brought up on charges of abetting fraud.
It will happen before Orly finally has success, which she will and would...but under the radar, there is more understanding in DC of what is really happening than Carter has liver pills.
Col Sellin is on the mark: Worst Constitutional Crisis since the Civil War and 100 times worse than Watergate.
Oh my, this is not good. Would that I could defend such ineptitude, but I cannot.
Well, there's still a chance the Supremes will decide they have been derelict long enough, and decide to take up the issue during their upcoming September conference.
Orly has been burning the candle at both ends, trying to keep her dental practice going, making crowns, all the while compiling and filing forms in Hawaii, 9th Circuit, and D.C. CUT HER SOME SLACK!! Any of the rest of you think you can fill her shoes, step up to the damn plate or shut your traps. She has been burning the midnight oil; I see her posting at 2-3 in the morning, and she is fighting for OUR FREEDOMS that Obama is taking away, one by one, as fast as he can. I just posted a link for a video where he is wanting to by-pass Congress, wants to be the Almighty. Any of you who have never screwed up, go ahead and post, but if you are not perfect, you have no right to be posting these negative things about Orly!
@C.A. Holly
Will they do this sua sponte ?
I donated to Orly about a month an a half ago. In light of this latest inept debacle however, I will now apply the old adage "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." I'm done with Orly, barring some stunning legal development that indicates major headway in the SS# case. I smell grifter. Nobody could be this consistently inept unless it was/is deliberate.
Pro Graphics, where art thou?
F/J
I hope this makes people understand that we cant wait around for orly court cases and 8 months away birther summits. We need to find out information that nobody can ignore or say is false and get it out to the media and the public. Our strongest weapon against obama is the truth about his citizenship(kenyan or indonesian) where he was born and his forgeries.
TAITZ IS AN OBOT YOU FOOLS
Orly Taitz has responded to the latest court developments:
- - - - - -- - - - - - -
"Things are not what they seem, I have a record of all the phone conversations with the DC court, as well as records of all the faxes and e-mails sent to them.
Posted on | July 26, 2011 | 1 Comment
Some employees of the DC court are lying to the judge. I kept record of all the phone calls, faxes and e-mails to the DC court and I have multiple witnesses as well. Some employee or employees of the DC court is/are lying and will be held accountable. On 07.21.2011 a fax was accepted in the DC court and was hand carried to the chambers of the chief judge. Sua sponte decision of the court on 07.21.2011 allowing me to resubmit the opposition was related to the fax received.
I will resubmit the opposition and memorandum in support of the opposition to motion for summary judgment yet again. It will be done today. Seal means, that you cannot see it on the electronic docket, but the documents are there and will be considered. The seal will be removed, hopefully tomorrow.
A lot is going on right now. Currently I am concentrating on doing everything I possibly can to inspect the original BC in HI and the original SSA application for Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama is fraudulently using. So far there is no formal opposition from HI and the Department of Justice did not file a reply to my opposition brief. Both Attorney General of HI and the US attorney for the District of Columbia are out of time to file. I am not sure what is the explanation for lack of opposition on their part: maybe, they think that the fix is in or maybe they are afraid to be prosecuted later for the obstruction of Justice and aiding and abetting the SSA fraud or maybe there is some technical glitch. Another legal action will be filed soon.
I will provide more information later. It also will be a part of my book, that will be coming out later. The book is tentatively titled “from the queen of the birthers. Secrets and intrigue behind the crime of the century” "
@ RS
"Yes the motion for the 21st of July is denied. However, I'm not so certain that the case has ended. She still appears to have a chance to make right until the judge puts forth his summary judgment that favors the defendant which would end the case."
The lack of proper redaction is only a fraction of the problem with her Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.
I've been posting all over the place telling everybody that Obama is going to have to resign because of his SS number but now I'm not so sure anymore.
Anon @ 1:15AM
This is where you can find Pro Graphics:
http://obamafake.blogspot.com
Orly has done more to expose the truth than all of the people on here combined. Success does not ever come without some set backs. If I understand, no ruling on the case has been made yet only a judge upset because he is not getting HIS way. Remember who's side he is on. Orly will not give up on this because it is FACT. Obama is using a STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and presented a fake birth certificate. Why is Congress not getting the blame for ignoring the facts? Why must you be so quick to jump on the only person leading the fight on the validity of Obama? Back up... think.. then post. If you can do better... DO IT!
I'm still with Orly. What would help is if another conservative lawyer would lend his/her services to assist Orly. I have this feeling she is out there all alone. I believe Orly. If the court and/or judge had any credibility, Soetoro, congress, and media talking heads would be in prison. So don't give me this crap on how rightious the court is. The court and judge know damn well what's going on and are working overtime to buy Soetoro time. It might be working now, problem is, it's not going to work when we arrive.
Barry soetoro is a Treasonous and Seditious Fraud...Not a Natural born Citizen...Fake BC's , Stolen SS#'s , When did he repatriate , much more and would take too much time to list.
This is BS, No One should not have to redact SS# numbers that are from the 1890's are being used to fraudulantly take away the Freedoms and Liberties and The Lives and Treasures from the American People .
Take a wild guess how long it would take for the Govt to Throw your buttocks under the jail if they knew YOU had a STOLEN SS# and other fake Documents...whats that saying ,'In a NY minute '.
Where is the Media investigation , It is a Fact that Barry Was NOT Constitutionally Qualified to run for the Office of President.
An illegal felonious criminal is President and the Courts are playing games with redacting numbers and Denying because of "Standing"...what a freaking joke.
How many cases have been denied or dismissed because of BS rulings , too dam many .
The Corruption is beyond Belief...IMO, It is time to Feed the Tree of Liberty...and Pardon and pacify this Perverse and Unconstitutional GOvt.
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them."
(john Wayne in The Shootist)
http://obamafake.blogspot.com/2011/07/obamas-forged-birth-certificate-and.html
Taitz has a long history of missteps in her legal work - some could say it is deliberate while others could say incompetent. She is always seeking donations and she and others seeking donations should be transparent in posting an annual financial report certified by an auditor how much was collected and how it was spent or retained. Is she a non-profit? I doubt it? What is her legal entity??
blah , blah , blah ...
Why do SS#'s from a person born in 1890's, who is deceased , and is being used in a felonious and seditious way need to be redacted ...?
This is not about some BS legal process , This is about an Illegal Treasonous Sob in the WH...The Corruption in the GOV'T and the Destruction of our Nation and Constitution.
@Trial
"Some of the Obots are making false accusations about you and are trying to claim you're not credible. They also claim debossed seals are perfectly normal."
Hmmm... That's strange, because I have been trying for two months to get a copy of a debossed seal from the HDOH with no such luck. They don't have one and there are no regulations that mention the use of a debossed seal. However there are two regulations that mention embossed seals.
The burden is on them to prove the HDOH uses one. They say they don't have one. (And pointing to bogus obot-planted debossed seals online is not proof.)=)
Can some high-speed lawyers step in and HELP her pro bono instead of kicking her ass with criticism?
GET OFF YOUR ASS AND PITCH IN!
THIS IS THE FIGHT FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE REPUBLIC!!!
DUH!!!
Obama has got to go. I'm getting tired of this and I am fed up just like everybody else who has been coming to this site for the last couple of years. The worst part in all of this is that the government gave us obama after 8 years of bush. We didn't even get a 4 year break.
Anon. at 5:42 A.M. You must be living in a dream world. Regardless of credible evidence brought foreward, Soetoro will never resign. I don't care if 100 smoking guns become public, Soetoro will never resign. Right now, games are being played in the courts. But I have always maintained the fact that only we could remove Soetoro and jail congress. Good or bad, I sense that day is coming. Some might claim that day is looming. Either way, it's coming.
@F/J
PG, also known as Pro Graphics and Proe Graphique (or something like that) is on his own website ObamaFake!
@RS
All the phone calls, emails, faxes and the like to not matter as they relate to Judge Lamberth's Orders of yesterday.
It is clear that no matter which version of her Opposition she sent to the Court it was defective and in violation of the rules.
So Orly can attempt to divert attention from what the real issue is by claiming "things are not what they seem," but in fact they are exactly as they seem.
Had she the capability to follow what are very simple rules (in this instance) there would have been no need for such a ruling.
@RS
Sorry to burst your bubble, Redd, but this case is postured for judgment in favor of Astrue, not for dismissal on procedural grounds.
Can you say "ckeckmate"?
I posted this at "The Blog of the LegalTimes - The Law of Lobbying in the Nation's Capital" who did an article on Orly Taitz. It's a good chance it does not get out of moderation.
"Taitz has a solid case to make if she can get out of the starting blocks only if she would consistently redact the SSN IAW the rules. Just doing a cursory look around about past FOIA cases, her chances of winning is good. Here are only a few good examples among many. I made a couple of comments about the excerpts seen in brackets.
- “38 Multi Ag, 515 F.3d at 1229-30; see, e.g., Barnard v. DHS, 598 F. ..
the public interest in disclosure outweighs the individual privacy concerns.'"39 Thus, as the D.C. Circuit has held, "a privacy interest may be substantial -- more than de minimis -- and yet be insufficient to overcome the public interest in disclosure."40
[The public interest about Obama's hidden past is close to the zenith among the public]
The D.C. Circuit has also emphasized the practical analytical point that under the FOIA's privacy-protection exemptions, "[t]he threat to privacy . . . need not be patent or obvious to be relevant." 41 At the same time, courts have found that the threat to privacy must be real rather than speculative. In National Ass'n of Ret. Fed Employees v. Horner ... the D.C. Circuit explained that the "relevant point" of its prior holding in Arieff v. US Dept of the Navy was that "mere speculation" of an invasion of privacy "is not itself part of the invasion of privacy ..."
- “115 See Forest Serv. Employees for Envtl. Ethics ... (noting that "while the privacy interests of public officials are 'somewhat reduced' when compared to those of private citizens, ...Kimberlin, 139 F.3d at 949 (stating that ''although government officials ... may have a 'somewhat diminished' privacy interest, ...
[We see that public officials have less rights to privacy than private citizens. Obama was not an appointed official as he was elected, and no ‘public official’ is more public than the president]
- “ Keys v. DHS...as a career public servant is not thereby stripped of every vestige of personal privacy, even with respect to the discharge of his official duties. Public identification of any of these individuals could conceivably subject them to harassment and annoyance..
Unless the information has become "practicably obscure," ... there is generally no expectation of privacy regarding information that is particularly well known or is widely available within the public domain... an individual generally does not have any expectation of privacy with respect to information that he or she has made public. The D.C. Circuit has held that under the public domain doctrine...
- The D.C. Circuit addressed the question of whether disclosure of mailing lists constituted a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy in National Ass'n of Ret. Fed Employees v. Horner, ... the D.C. Circuit held that mailing lists consisting of names and home addresses of federal annuitants are categorically withholdable..
In these types of cases, courts have frequently found the asserted public interest too attenuated to overcome the clear privacy interest an individual has in his name and home address. Nevertheless, several lower courts have ordered the disclosure of such information in certain contexts. Some of these courts have found little or no privacy interest in the names and addresses at issue."
[The privacy claim concerning ‘name and address’ should not be redacted in the FOIA request for Obama's 1977 Connecticut SSA application, if it is his SSN application or if the application exists, is frivolous. Obama’s domicile address is the most publicly known in the world at 1600 Pennsylvania Av, DC, and to expect privacy for a decades old former address from 35 years ago is practically non-existent]
Re Pro Graphics/Proe Graphique this blog on his new site was featured yesterday as the "column du jour" at - World Net Daily! He's keeping pretty fast company, now.
http://obamafake.blogspot.com/2011/07/obamas-forged-birth-certificate-and.html
@Anonymous
Well FogBlower, You guys are relying on a procedural matter that snafu's the case instead of having the case be argued on the merits. You got to wonder OBot, why didn't Judge Lamberth dismiss the case from the beginning if it was frivolous? You clowns at Fogblow land were sooooooo disappointed when that did not happen. LoL. And don't say you guys were not expecting the judge to dismiss the case outright - you guys were.
I noticed that my post over at the DC OBot blogland "LegalTimes" had to have a lame qualifying statement before it was even posted.
Here's my follow up to that silly qualifying statement by Bob:
"@RS: No need to pass off the DOJ's work as your own"
"Oh I didn't. There are quotes around what is not is mine, and I said my comments are in brackets. I see it was easy for you to find the DOJ guidelines. It is ironic that the DOJ has put out a 'one stop shop' of past cases that so easily skewers the government's case. "
Read the "cut and paste" from the DOJ guidlines OBots for content - it does blows the Fogblower's nonsense away. :-)
Get off your butts now and help Orly instead of pissing and moaning!
Why does a female Russian immigrant with a family and business on the side have to do all the heavy lifting?
Mr. Haskins can you help Orly please? Why doesn't Puzo help? What the fuck???!!!
Orly has been offered help time and time again. She doesn't listen.
It is quite simple. REDACT the fucking social security numbers according to court RULES.
@TheEuropean
"Will they do this sua sponte?"
See article dated June 27, 2011 @ United States Justice Foundation
http:usjf.net/2011/06/eligibility-returns-to-supremes-conference-agenda/
On September 26, the Court is to take up Alan Keyes, et al. v. Debra Bowen, CA Sec. of State, et al. in conference. As the article informs, all previous eligibility cases considered in conference were rejected without explanation. A lone remark by Justice Thomas alluding to eligibility avoidance is all we have heard to date.
@Anonymous
Attorneys and others have offered advice. But she instead files an inflammatory motion for clarification anyway. She instead willingly fails to properly redact the SS number. She ignores advice on how to properly serve the subpoenas and wonders why no one responds. And then she states she is on "pins and needles" after all this.
@Drakkhanlord
John Wayne actually was a coward.
@TheEuropean
A coward? I'd like to see you pull up on your moped alongside parked Harleys at an American tavern and say that. Triple dog dare ya Eurotrash.
I gave those clowns over at "The Blog for the LegalTimes" for the DC lawyer crowd one for the road. ;-)
The LegalTimes tried to keep me from posting over there after 2 tiny posting by using a cookie identifier.
I'd get a pop up message stating, "We're sorry, we cannot accept this data" (I at least got it into the moderation section)
You mean you guys can't stand any logical answers to questions that takes apart OBot logic. LoL.
- - - - - -
Obot CarrrollStraus:
"You see the words, but they don't have any meaning for you.
A person has a privacy expectation in his or her own social security number. (Exhibit A: The federal courts even made a rule preventing their disclosure in pleadings!) There is no public interest that is going to outweigh that privacy interest."
[Me ] Oh, I understand better than OK, and there is a very large public interest in Obama's Connecticut SSN that totally outweighs any privacy expectation in this case. You should know that Taitz did ask for a redacted Obama SSN application so any 'privacy expectation' would be satisfied. The intransigence here by the government makes no sense. They should have nothing to hide but they do.
Taitz has formally motioned the court that is written on page 9 in document 17. Following the hyperlink below to see.
"1. To order defendant to release limited redacted information from SS-5 application for the Social Security number XXX-XX-4425"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57938217/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-U-S-D-C-DC-17-Redacted-AMENDED-COMPLAINT-against-MICHAEL-ASTRUE-gov-uscourts-dcd-146770-17-0?in_collection=2874577
@Anonymous How about you realize the truth? She doesn't accept help from other lawyers but she has no problem taking my money and other people's money as well. The only thing she has done with this money is to make herself look foolish and us look foolish as well. That is exactly what an Obot would do. Quit drinking the kool-aid!
@RS
Hey, Redd. A complaint is not a motion. Perhaps you need to acquaint yourself with civil procedure before you post erroneous s*** that demonstrates you have no clue about law and the Federal Rules.
@RS
Oh, and Redd -- a litigant doesn't "motion" the court. "Motion" is a noun. The verb form is "move" as in, "Orly moved the court to blah blah blah."
Except, of course, she didn't. The only motions she has filed are (1) for compelling compliance with a subpoena she STILL has not properly served, and (2) for reconsideration of every single ruling necessary to correct her many filing mishaps.
@Anonymous
You OBot clowns are so full of BS that it's coming out your all your orifices. You guys say look here look here so in the hope that no one sees your nonsense.
@Anonymous
Here is Taitz's complaint again OBot or whatever you want to call it, which is stated in court document #17 asking the court for a redacted SS-5 application that allegedly belongs to Obama.
"1. To order defendant to release limited redacted information from SS-5 application for the Social Security number XXX-XX-4425"
As you can see OBot, that she's trying meet the Gooobertmint's intransigence halfway where Obama really doesn't have any expectation to privacy...as I have documented on this thread.
@ J.Madsen, Florence Stone, Charlesmountain ,RS, Others:
Thank you Guys for coming to Orly's defence. I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who CONSIDERS her Relentless Struggle. With your permission I would like to add my contribution in defence of our GREATEST WARRIOR, ORLY TAITZ..!
@ All: Please be advised that I am trying to cut down on the Tone for the sake of Unity. This will be hard for me as some of you know but I 'm starting to fear that we are being Divided for Conquering.
@ At those that as usual just can't wait for an opportunity to pounce on Orly like SNARLING HIENNAS:
You Worthless Bunch of Dis Considerate Ungrateful Maggots..!
It is one thing to criticize Orly on her work. That I can understand. (I too think she's fucking up here even though she's obviously right about the redaction being technically irrelevant.) But to suggest that Orly is corrupt Just proves your ignorance at best and at worse that you are a piece of shit.
If Orly is corrupt then we are all corrupt..! End of story... Stick a fork in us we're done..! THE PROBLEM ISN'T ORLY you Dumb Fucks. The problem is WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ORLYS..! Even if she DOES fuck up from time to time.
I challenge anyone who thinks they can do a better job to STEP UP!
Sometime Tonight would be fine... Don't all jump into the ring at once now..! As soon as somebody does you guys make sure and let me know. But until that "Awesome Lawyer" that "Makes no Mistakes" and is willing to disclose "All their Financial Records" that "We May Accept Him" comes to our rescue... I'm gonna support the BEST THAT WE GOT. "ORLY FUCKING TAITZ!"
My Apologies to any True Patriot that I may be offending. Because in the end I think we are all very Pissed Off here. And we are all going to need each other. But that's the way I see it. However if you trully are a Commy Rat Obot Bastard , FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON..!
@Ann S.
Thank you, Ann. Also thank you to Charlene, Saska and Anonymous. I have connected with the site and am now greedily devouring the content. Game on, Obots!!!!!
F/J
CommieKiller, *All: Please be advised that I am trying to cut down on the Tone for the sake of Unity. This will be hard for me as some of you know but I 'm starting to fear that we are being Divided for Conquering*
CK I could not agree with you more! *...being divided for conquering* it is what people with no other strategy or TRUTH do. We all must try very hard to realize that not all Patriots are going to agree on everything and then act accordingly. It is great to disagree, that is how we stay open. I too have day's when I want to bite some heads off. We have to be careful not to bite the heads off fellow people who are looking for the truth.
The Obots are generally easy to distinquish, they have no clue and do indeed try to get us going , arquing on their terms of BS. I say read what they have to say, mumble FU, and move on. This distraction and anger they can arouse suits the purpose they are being paid for. (is that OUR money they are being paid with or is Soros footing the bill?) How disgraceful. How ashamed anyone who does not want, need, and demand TRUTH should be.
Many have fought , lost lives, ruined their lives fighting for the Freedoms that are now being threatened by the new regime. Face it Obots, you are backing a regime full of liars, commies, unscrupulous beings.
None the less we must focus on the things that matter and ignore, totally the distractions. Do we think anything will change the minds of the Obots? I doubt it, so why bother? (remember ya can't change stupid)
When it comes to disagreeing on ideas, such as Orly, try to just understand that posters point of view and go on. We have bigger fish to fry and do not need to be distracted and certainly do not need any *in- fighting* We need to stay focused and UNITED, less we fall divided. Let's play nice!
Damn, I agree with commie killer. Question is, why hasn't a lawyer stepped up to assist Orly? Team work would help Orly work her way through the process of winning a lot smoother and, possibly, a lot quicker.
@C.A. Holly
C.A.Holly,
your quote goes to WND / Bob Unruh. He has a picture of the docket.
Debra Bowen waived the right to respond. As long as the Supremes do not ask her to respond they will not take up the case. This is how skilled lawyers can predict the outcome long before the conference.
@ C.A.Holly:
read this please (from Wikipedia:
America's entry into World War II resulted in a deluge of support for the war effort from all sectors of society, and Hollywood was no exception. Many established stars rushed to sign up for military service.
As the majority of male leads left Hollywood to serve overseas, John Wayne saw his just-blossoming stardom at risk. Despite enormous pressure from his inner circle of friends, he put off enlisting. Wayne was exempted from service due to his age (34 at the time of Pearl Harbor) and family status, classified as 3-A (family deferment). Wayne's secretary recalled making inquiries of military officials on behalf of his interest in enlisting, "but he never really followed up on them."[37] He repeatedly wrote to John Ford, asking to be placed in Ford's military unit, but consistently postponed it until "after he finished one more film."[38] Republic Studios was emphatically resistant to losing Wayne, especially after the loss of Gene Autry to the Army.[39]
Correspondence between Wayne and Herbert J. Yates (the head of Republic) indicates Yates threatened Wayne with a lawsuit if he walked away from his contract, though the likelihood of a studio suing its biggest star for going to war was minute.[40] Whether or not the threat was real, Wayne did not test it. Selective Service records indicate he did not attempt to prevent his reclassification as 1-A (draft eligible), but apparently Republic Pictures intervened directly, requesting his further deferment.[41] In May, 1944, Wayne was reclassified as 1-A (draft eligible), but the studio obtained another 2-A deferment (for "support of national health, safety, or interest").[41] He remained 2-A until the war's end. Thus, John Wayne did not illegally "dodge" the draft, but he never took direct positive action toward enlistment.
Wayne was in the South Pacific theater of the war for three months in 1943–44, touring U.S. bases and hospitals, as well as doing some work for OSS commander William J. "Wild Bill" Donovan, who "hoped that a celebrity like Wayne could provide information denied his own operatives. Donovan was particularly interested in Wayne's assessment of MacArthur himself. Wayne's mission was only partly successful. He never met MacArthur, and although he filed a report with Donovan when he got back to the States, he had nothing substantial to offer Donovan." [42] Donovan gave him a plaque and commendation for serving with the OSS, but Wayne dismissed it as meaningless.[43]
The foregoing facts influenced the direction of Wayne's later life. By many accounts, Wayne's failure to serve in the military during World War II was the most painful experience of his life.[44] Some other stars, for various reasons, did not enlist, but Wayne, by virtue of becoming a celluloid war hero in several patriotic war films, as well as an outspoken supporter of conservative political causes and the Vietnam War, became the focus of particular disdain from both himself and certain portions of the public, particularly in later years. While some hold Wayne in contempt for the paradox between his early actions and his later attitudes, his widow suggests Wayne's rampant patriotism in later decades sprang not from hypocrisy but from guilt. Pilar Wayne wrote, "He would become a 'superpatriot' for the rest of his life trying to atone for staying home."[45]
@TheEuropean
I've read that Wayne Wiki before and nothing it states there made Wayne a coward. The preferred draft and enlisting age in the early part of the war was from 18 to 29 years old.
Wayne being 34 years old at the time as Wiki even says was a tad on the old side, and when the US really got moving in the war in 1942, Wayne was 35.
Is that the same Wikipedia that anyone can publish and edit content?
@TheEuropean
First, I quoted no one. I offered a brief summation in my own words, thus the absence of quotation marks. Second, I directed your attention to an article posted at the United States Justice Foundation which was but one site reporting on the September conference.
@TheEuropean
None of my professors have ever accepted Wikipedia as a credible source, and no serious researcher, scholar or student would be found dead citing material found there.
Furthermore, by your calculation Obama would be a coward for not having served in the military. Think about it.
Taitz's redacted of Opposition to Defendants Motion of Summary Judgment was filed with a minor omission or two. Exhibit 9 to be sealed because of improper redaction.
The flying FogBlow Monkeys are asking for sanction because of it. Lamberth appears to be moving on and will do minor fixes there. Hey Fogbutts, give it a rest.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61141291/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-31-0-Memorandum-in-opposition-to-re-21-MOTION-for-Summary-Judgment-filed-by-ORLY-TAITZ-gov-uscourts-dcd-146770-31-0
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.