News Release: A direct challenge to Attorney and Radio Show Host Mark Levin
I, on behalf of Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ, challenge Atty Mark Levin to debate on his radio show, or a venue of Mark Levin’s choosing, the legal term of art “natural born Citizen of the United States”, and Obama and Rubio's constitutional ineligibility, with Article II, Section 1 constitutional presidential eligibility expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ. Mark Levin, do you have the guts to have an on-air debate on the issue you so readily dismiss. Attorney Apuzzo has accepted the challenge. If anyone reading this knows Mark Levin's personal email address, forward to him this challenge. Mark, here’s the link to get in touch with Atty Apuzzo if you have the gonads to debate another attorney on the issue you pontificate about on your radio show but provide no contemporaneous historical or legal facts from the founding and constitution drafting era to back up your position: http://puzo1.blogspot.comFor more information on the challenge and the issues see: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/citizen-letter-to-%e2%80%9cconservative%e2%80%9d-talk-show-host-mark-levin-you%e2%80%99re-a-%e2%80%9chuge-disappointment%e2%80%9d-with-all-of-their-resources-why-won%e2%80%99t-they-do-the-research
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 26 Sep 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

43 comments:
Everyone should blast Levin's email address with this link.
marklevin.show@citcomm.com
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/09/mark-levin-bans-birthers-direct.html
Everyone can twitter to Mark Levin at:
@marklevinshow
hannity and rush are his best buds, at least rush has joked about obama being a complete fraud and only God and ozero have no birth records!
It is a debate that he cannot win, and so I predict that he will not accept.
Mark Levin's comments have left me speechless. I truly don't know what to make of this. He's a really smart man that I respect and, up until now, have trusted. If he would give an explanation that at least I could agree or disagree with, but he is just dismissing the entire subject. According to Doug Hagmann (private investigator) someone at some NY TV station knows the truth and was threatened before ozero was even inaugurated - maybe Levin is protecting that person.
I don't know, but this issue had better be addressed because we already have another muslim who just got the okay from the FCC to raise money for his Presidency campaign for 2012! Some guy who is a "naturalized citizen"
someone should levin if anybody is ineligible to be potus.
I listened to Mark Levin faithfully for several years. I wondered why he never mentioned anything about Obama hiding his personal history. When Mark continued to ignore Obama's claim that his father was a Kenyan (non-US citizen), I began to question how serious Mark was about his adherence to the US Constitution. Obama's father was not a US citizen, so Obama, not matter where he was born, is not a natural born citizen and is not eligible to be POTUS. Rubio and Jindal are not NBCs either and are also ineligible. Levin continues to ignore this fact, so I think he is a "situational" Constitutionalist. To bad Mark, up until now you had me fooled. You are not as tough as your talk nor are you as faithful to the US Constitution, where Obama is concerned, as you would have us believe. Of course, you might know something that we don't about Obama's status, but then why wouldn't you share that with you listeners. Okay tough guy face Apuzzo and let the chips fall where they may...of course you won't take him on because you know he will win in the end.
I don't understand why anyone, in his/her right mind, would waste time listening to any of them. And then, afterwards, complain about what was not said. I turned them all off years ago when it was obvious the illegal's inelegibility wouild not be addressed.
My tweet to Levin - "Heard your Rubio BS. He's not NBC he's an anchor baby. According to you achor babies are NBC. BS! Take Apuzzo's challenge."
Gutless scumbag. He will never do it.
I stopped listening to him when he called birthers names. I consider him part of the MSM entertainment biz.
Has this site been hacked? I can't seem to post here - at least through Internet Explorer. This post is through Firefox. Is anyone else having this problem?
Mark Levin, what a fraud. He tries to come off as Mr. Constitution, Mr. Law and Order. Think of all the millions he made off his latest book. And I'm sure many of us bought that book. I did. Yet he has the gall to call his customers goofballs? I hope he, Hannity, Rush and all the rest, including Fox News go off the air.
Every passing year, the Internet becomes the news information source of choice for more Americans. In a few years, if we survive, these people will be totally irrelevant. We don't HAVE to be lied to. There are people out there that are honest - like the guy who runs this site...Honest people WILL take over one day.
Somebody must have put a horse head in his bed or something.
@bn
I posted this using IE.
anyone trying to sell Rubio or Jindal as natural born citizens are traitors. They need to be called out as just that any time they speak. Do they really think we can't or wont find the truth? Stop listening to them when they lie. Call them out for the lie then cut them off. We the people need to make it clear we wont listen to them if they lie. Fox news is no better than MSNBC because of this fact they refuse to let the truth out. write them and let them know why you will no longer be a listener or viewer. Call them out for their spreading of this lie. ITS UP TO US, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! YOU LIE, YOU DIE!
I've lost all respect for Levin, Hanity, FOX News, and placed them directly in the same sewer that the main-sewer-stream media is in. If they want to jump onto the Obama bandwagon I want no part of them
Mark Levin, Fox News, Glenn Beck and others who have denigrated, ignored and ridiculed this issue have thrown out the Constitution. Having thrown out the "Baby", there is no sense in listening to anything else they have to say because all that is left is "Bathwater".
ELmo
@Dealio
As of now, Levin has been cancelled
on WMAL radio in the DC area.
No joke. Good riddance to such
intolerant garbage. He is nothing
but a lawyer for Obama. Beware!
HS
What I find telling, is that the two names - out of all the names that could be advanced - are Rubio and Jindal. What is that? There are sooo many, yet these two keep getting promoted over and over again. Just these two.
I don't even know what in hell Jindal is supposed to be so good at. Yet here they are. Being talked up and glorified by everyone in talk radio, and on TV from Fox.
Just to cover up their complicity in breaking the Constitution. IMO
@Anonymous
Thanks for supplying Levin's email address.
Levin needs to be told that he no longer needs to prove his manhood by segregating Constitutionalist birthers to the sidelines because he cannot tolerate reality.
Sometime ago, I think I remember hearing Levin on Hannity's radio show, salivating over a Marco Rubio GOP VP pick. It sickened my stomach and I switched the program off.
The best way for the GOP to lose a raft of voters for the GOP 2012 presidential side, is to go ahead and nominate Rubio for VP. That will be the last straw with many Constitutionalist Conservatives and birthers. Little big men like Levin, then can thank themselves for helping to hand Obama, a re-election because of their betrayal to our Constitutional Republic!
"Why some Conservatives will not vote for the 2012 GOP nominee:"
http://freedomtorch.com/blogs/12090/3316/why-some-conservatives-will-not
Quote from myveryownpointofview:
"Just to cover up their complicity in breaking the Constitution. IMO"
I believe you are correct, those most involved in getting the ineligible Obama elected would like nothing better than to get other ineligible candidates on the ballot and elected. They believe that would be the nail in the coffin of natural born Citizen as it was meant to be and remove any possibility of criminal changes against them.
@myveryownpointofview
"Out of all the names that could be advanced..."
This is a very good observation IMO.
Now that it is pointed out, I agree.
This could be a part of the effort to reform or get rid of the Constitution without going through the Article V process.
ELmo
eee
You wouldn't believe the number of ignorant Americans that think just because the "media" and Mark Levine say Rubio is qualified, that they trust that he is! This is no joke! Levine is misleading a lot of people into thinking Obummer is qualified, so therefore so is Rubio. I've been arguing with idiots on this very thing on a forum and they just don't WANT to know the truth because the "media" says something else. Trying to make them understand that the media is not truthworthy is purely a waste of my time. I gave up. Levine should be ashamed of himself and needs to have his a$$ kicked.
-Has this site been hacked? I can't seem to post here - at least through Internet Explorer. This post is through Firefox. Is anyone else having this problem?
"ALL BEWARE" Internet censorship is in full swing in Bozo's America. I have not been able to post on my IE for about a week now. At first I thought it was me but now I'm reading that it's happening to many of us on many websites. Orly has a couple of articles on it this being one of them: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=26058
We are being shut down..!
P.S. Give'em Hell Dealio.
Mark Levin turned out to be just another PUSSY..!
@Commykiller
This is a test to see if I can post yet.
I read the comments here and basically conclude the same thing about Rubio and/or Jindal as about Barry. Nothing is going to happen folks. No matter who the Republican nominee is, that person will never bring up the NBC issue either with regard to Barry or Rubio or Jindal. Even though the nominee will never say as much, we would hope he/she would stay away from Rubio or Jindal because of their ineligibility. But...if the nominee chooses expediency over integrity and picks one of these two - just like Barry - nothing will happen - nobody will say anything. The well has been permanently poisoned. Barry has not only scammed everybody on his behalf, his election has redefined NBC for good. Now, anybody can run for POTUS regardless if NBC or not. Put another way, everybody is NBC now.
Unless and until somebody with some credibility either in the media or politics stands up, this is over. Levin cannot be as stupid as to not be aware of the historical record regarding NBC.
I love his threat in the video. What's he gonna do? No reply to my tweet. He needs his ass kicked, that's what he needs.
Why does such a smart man make such an obviously stupid statement with such vigor you believe he believes it.
I barely graduated high school and I can read the constitution and the subsequent supreme court cases and have no problem understanding the law. So why is Mark, a constitutional attorney, ignoring the document he cherishes so much? Why just this part?
I have listened to Mark for YEARS. He has made me so much smarter but now.... if he is blind to 1 issue... an issue so critical to our countries founding and future... what else is he lying about? Can you even trust this man now? Wow... Mark, I am really hurt. Of all people, I look to you as the expert on the constitution. Now? I question everything you have told me.... and millions of your listeners.
Please explain your comments about Rubio. Please explain your lack of concern for Obama's ineligibility. I'd love to hear you defend any of them. BASED ON FACT and law.
I am truly disappointed.
Jefferson said to revolt. The fact that we remain incapable tells me we, as Americans, are American no more. There are many terms to describe us now, but "American" is not one of them.
@Commykiller
Just so you know, I am posting a reply to you using IE and I have never had trouble posting here using IE.
There is a way to get NBC into the news and have the historical record and definition by Vattel applied to the presidential election in 2012. What is it? Let the Republican nominee choose Marco Rubio for VP. The liberal media would try to ignore Rubio's lack of eligibility at the beginning but they would soon go into a frenzy over the "utter hypocrisy" of the tea party (whom they see as the ultimate racist birthers even if they're not pushing NBC) and the Republican party for embracing racism and xenophobia by not denouncing the tea party.
The only way to blow the NBC issue wide open is for the liberal press to report on it and the only way for them to report on it is for Rubio to run as VP.
It would hurt Obama but I am not certain the liberal media wouldn't throw Obama under the bus for the chance to expose the tea party and Republicans as lying manipulators. The real question is could the liberal media contain itself if Republicans ran an ineligible candidate after all the covering they've done for Obama on this issue? It's not possible.
The liberal media could not stop itself from reporting this story, it would have to seep out of the sewer that is the MSM.
Republicans would be stupid to run Rubio, but the temptation is there and it is the only way the nation will get the NBC issue to the forefront where it belongs.
The nation cannot stand to let foreigners take control of 1/3 of the government. It has happened with Obama and the damage he has done is small compared to what will happen once we are 3-4 deep with foreign influence in our executive branch.
Let Rubio run, support having Rubio run, clear the path for Rubio to run. This is a strategy to squeeze the puss out of the liberal media and GET THEM TO DO WHAT WE WANT THEM TO DO.
What is the worst that will happen? The media says nothing about Rubio and he runs against Obama on a presidential ticket. Ok. NBC is redefined. This is going to happen if Rubio doesn't run, but the only way to stop the redefinition is to support Rubio running and let the MSM expose the whole scam.
The liberals may decide they don't want Obama running anyway and exposing his ineligibility might fall in line with their strategy to oust him.
What about all the laws he's signed until now? Will the liberal media even care if they all went away? Start over with a clean slate? Obama has soiled the liberal/socialist image anyway because he is so inept and weak.
Run, Rubio, Run!
There are alternative candidates. John Dummett is running as a "Republican", and is a strict Constitutionalist. He sure could use some name recognition so people KNOW they have a candidate they can really wrap their arms around!
Please be sure to check out his platform.
http://www.johndummett.us/platform.html
I don't believe you would hear a peep from the main stream media if Rubio was the Republican VP candidate. If anything they would slam the same people who are objecting to Obama's ineligibility if we objected to Rubio on the same grounds.
Rubio would take all the pressure off the scumbags who put the ineligible Obama in office and drive the final nail in the coffin of natural born Citizen and justify the MSM having said nothing about Obama's lack of natural born Citizenship.
After three years of protecting Obama there is no way the MSM would make not being a natural born Citizen an issue, no matter who the candidate might be, or which party they represent.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Let me first say that any thought that the liberal media is going to be an asset in the NBC issue, is....well, a pipe dream. These guys are so rectal cranial for Barry that they would never do anything to contribute to raising this issue. On the other hand, in the feeble minds of the average Joe, they have a stronger argument for Barry than there is for Rubio. At least Barry had one citizen parent. Rubio, zero, zilch, nada. Of course, Barry is a dual citizen - not sure if Rubio is also a Cuban citizen - that's questionable.
No, NBC has not just been redefined, it has been rendered totally inconsequential since nobody of any credibility is standing up. Next time you hear any of the talking heads or politicians talking about how important the constitution is, just think about what an empty hypocritical thing that is to say if you don't believe in all of it. Makes me sad, really sad.
@Dealio
Jefferson also said:
"Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
Things aren't bad enough yet, (so people are more disposed to suffer than to change) but things may be much worse before too long. Be careful what you wish for though.
ELmo
J. Madsen wrote:
>Why does such a smart man make such an obviously stupid statement with such vigor you believe he believes it.
I barely graduated high school and I can read the constitution and the subsequent supreme court cases and have no problem understanding the law. So why is Mark, a constitutional attorney, ignoring the document he cherishes so much? Why just this part?<
Dear J. Madsen,
Here's my take on it, okay? You say that you barely graduated from high school, yet you have a lot of something which the so-called intellectuals don't have yet for some reason, which is common sense. J. Madsen, common sense rates so much higher than any intellectual can ever dream up or admit.
See, being so super-intelligent and have a huge law degree doesn't do a thing. I'm not saying that it's wrong to get those things or get a degree. What I'm saying is this, they have kind of bypassed common sense. To have common sense, like you do, means that you have more wisdom to look at things as they should be.
Common sense means a...per Merriam-Webster's.... "sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts."
See, common sense is greater than how highly the so-called intellectuals place their mental abilities on.
This is why you see things clearly, and why Levine can't because maybe he thinks that he's too smart (possibly arrogance?), which makes him stupid, but in the meantime, it makes you so much more intelligent because of your common-sense approach.
Common sense totally rules, and don't you forget it! You're on the right track.
-Jefferson said to revolt. The fact that we remain incapable tells me we, as Americans, are American no more. There are many terms to describe us now, but "American" is not one of them.
Somewhere along the way we lost our BALLS. The moment that happened it stoped being the "HOME OF THE BRAVE", and consequently no longger the "LAND OF THE FREE..!"
Check this out at www.thepostemail.com
J.B. Williams does good work.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/02/debate-over-not-natural-born-period/
Levin, Hannity and the rest of them are as "establishment" as the politicians they supposedly disagree with. They talk the talk to make money, but in the end they couldn't care less if this nation collapses. Levin, especially, annoys me. He tries to be some type of cheap ripoff of Michael Savage, who incidentally has admitted that he doesn't talk about Obama's ineligibility because it's bad for his ratings. I emailed Levin a number of times when I was in Afghanistan after he first started railing against birthers and made it clear that he is spitting on the graves of my fallen comrades by ignoring Obama's ineligibility. I can't even imagine having such a platform as he does to make a difference and he is more concerned about making a few bucks then preserving this nation for his kids and grandkids.
I listen to Mark Levin religiously and admire and respect him thoroughly. His adamant refusal to discuss the birther issue is because he knows, and everyone posting should know, that by the time any legal challenge wound it's way through the system it would simply not serve the purpose of its initiation, have O-dumb-o removed from office. And as you see with all challenges that have made it through to the Supremes, it gets thrown out or ruled against. You're better have buying a ticket for the next cruise on the Titanic.
@Anonymous
With regard to anonymous' statement "I listen to Mark Levin religiously and admire and respect him thoroughly......." Why is the conceded slowness of the legal process a reason to bury the issue as if it does not exist or does not matter??. IT MATTERS. Why is it verboten for discussion and debate? Unconstitutional is Unconstitutional, by God, and it means something. We are supposed to be a nation of laws, and does it not follow that if the president is not to be bound by any authority then why should anyone else be? Why would Levin simply not say that Obum is unconstitutional and just running the clock out? He won't even venture that far. Weak. This is a form of coverup if i ever saw one, so why is Levin involved in that? Out of one side of his mouth he (and the others) say that everything possible should be done to get Obum out of office, but they refuse to explore this issue, which is rich with potential to challenge eligibility. The Emporer has no clothes. How deep is the rabbit hole.
Levin, Hannity Ican not listen to them,that's reason for me turn radio off!!!!!
They're all turncoats
Rush, Hannity, Levin, Medved
They were threatened with death to themselves or their families, resulting in their appeasement. It's the Chicago way. Lou Dobbs had bullets shot into his house. Even Savage won't go there.
So it's entirely up to us.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.