Joint Ballot Access Challenge Filed Against Obama Being Placed on Hawaii Ballot

Ballot Access Challenge Filed Against Obama Being Placed on the Hawaii Ballot

Joint petition by Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Mr. Ron Wong, resident of Honolulu, Hawaii, as well as State Representative of the State of New Hampshire, Larry Rappaport

PETITION UNDER HAWAII ELECTIONS LAW §3-172–3 and demand for an emergency hearing under §3-171-4

COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD

I.§3-171-3 Adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules.

When pursuant a petition therefore , or upon the chief elections officer’s own motion, the chief election officer proposes to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule, the rule shall be adopted, amended, or repealed in according to procedures set forth in Chapter 91 and section 92-41, HRS

§3-171-4 Conduct of hearing. (a) The chief election officer shall afford all interested persons the opportunity to submit data, views, or argument.

(3)(b) The chief election officer or the designated representative shall conduct the public hearing

Petitioners demand a public hearing seeking modification of elections rules in order to close an existing loophole, which allows an inelligble candidate to put his name on the ballot as a candidate for the U.S. President in violation of the Naural Born Citizen provision. Petitioners are seeking to add a procedure allowing members of the public and U.S. voters to inspect identification records and eligibility records of the presidential and vice presidential candidates, in order to uphold and protect citizens inalienable civil and human right to lawful elections, free of fraud and forgery.

This issue came to light during the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. Recently released passport records of his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, show , that after her second marriage, Ms. Dunham took the last name of her second husband and went by the name Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro. In 1968 Ms. Dunham Soetoro applied to renew her U.S. passport. On page 2 of her renewal application, under” Amend to include/exclude children”, she excluded her son Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah. (Exhibit 10 (a) Passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham with her dependent son listed under the name Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah.)

Exhibit 10(b) shows Barack Obama’s school registration in Indonesia, provided by the Associated Press and acknowledged by Mr. Obama. It lists him using his step father’s last name Soetoro. It is common in South East Asia: Indonesia and India, to blend names together, which might explain Soebarkah, as a blend of Obama’s last name by his step father, indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro, and his first name Barack, to create a moniker, a blended name Soebarkah.

There is no record of Mr. Obama ever legally changing his name from Soetoro or Soebarkah to Obama. As such he cannot be on the ballot without ascertaining his legal name. One cannot run for the U.S. President under a name, which is not legally his. Until this recent release of Mr. Obama’s mother’s passport records, the name Soebarkah was not known and was not brought forward during the 2008 campaign.

Additionally, in his school registration records, his citizenship is listed as Indonesian, as such, as a foreign national, he cannot be the US President.

Additionally, Taitz found out that Social Security number 042-68-4425, which is used by Obama in his tax returns and his Selective Service registration, is not legally his according to E-Verify and Social Security Number Verification systems records, as well as the fact, that an alleged copy of his long form birth certificate, posted by Obama online on WhiteHouse.gov, represents a computer generated forgery and not a true and correct copy of the original document.

Taitz filed multiple legal challenges to obtain access to and inspection of the records in question, however Director of Health Loretta Fuddy and Registrar Onaka, as well the court system in HI are being complicit in the cover up of this forgery and elections fraud and refusing to allow inspection of the original birth certificate allegedly on file in liue of the alleged copy.

II. COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD

ELECTION LAW COMPLAINT FORM, SEEKING TO REMOVE FROM THE BALLOT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE FROM DEMOCRAT PARTY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II DUE TO SUSPECTED ELECTIONS FRAUD, LACK OF ELIGIBILITY, LACK OF PROOF OF NATURAL BORN US CITIZEN STATUS DUE TO LACK OF ANY LEGAL AND VERIFYABLE IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS AND DUE TO FRAUDULENT USE OF A CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042 -68-4425, WHICH WAS NEVER ASSIGNED TO HIM ACCORDING TO E-VERIFY AND SSNVS, AND DUE TO USE OF A COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY INSTEAD OF A VALID LONG FORM U.S. BIRTH CERTIFICATE, as well as use of a name, which does not correspond with official passport and school records of the candidate, where he previously used last names Soetoro and Soebarkah, not Obama.

JURISDICTION AND PERTINENT LAW

COMPLAINT CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/74235542/Hawaii-Ballot-Challenge-Filed-Against-Obama-Being-Placed-on-the-Hawaii-Primary-Ballot

Hawaii Ballot Challenge Filed Against Obama Being Placed on the Hawaii Primary Ballot

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

New FOIA Lawsuit Filed Against FBI, DOJ, Bob Bauer Over Obama's Missing Records

Berryville Man Files Federal Lawsuit Over FOIA Response

Edward Leonard @ Clarke Daily News

A local man is asking a United States federal court to help him gain access to information related to the citizenship history of President Barack Obama.

Berryville resident, George Archibald has petitioned the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to compel the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and former White House Counsel Robert Bauer to produce documents that Archibald says may provide new insight into whether the President’s mother forfeited his US citizenship when Obama was just six-years-old.

If Archibald’s suspicion is correct it would raise important questions about the legitimacy of Obama’s qualifications to hold the office of President of the United States.

“I’m not a ‘birther,’’’ Archibald said after filing his lawsuit. “I’m simply interested in getting to the bottom of what appears to be stone-walling by the administration against my Freedom of Information request.”

In the suit, filed on November 16 in the District of Columbia, Archibald alleges that a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that he filed with the FBI’s Winchester, Virginia office on April 15, 2011 asking for information produced during the FBI’s background check of presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama II was improperly rejected. In the FOIA request Archibald asks for “information regarding Obama’s birth in 1961, family background, citizenship, residency, immigration, expatriation/repatriation, and other matters related to Obama’ s origins and nationality generated during the FBI’s 2008 investigation of presidential candidates.”

Archibald’s request is based on President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Executive Order 10450, “Security Requirements for Government Employment,” issued in 1953. Under the Eisenhower directive, the FBI conducts background checks on all presidential candidates. Archibald is seeking information that may have turned up in the FBI investigation related to Barach Obama’s citizenship status after his mother wed an Indonesian citizen.

Archibald believes that after Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, arrived in Djakarta with her young son in 1967, who he says was adopted by stepfather Lolo Soetoro, Barry Obama maintained permanent residency and schooling in Indonesia until 1971 before returning to Honolulu in 1979 to live with his maternal grandparents where he attended high school and later graduated. Archibald contends that Indonesian authorities would have required the young Obama to naturalize in order to remain in the country and attend school.

“The fact that your mother, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, took you [Barach Obama] to live in Indonesia in 1967, at age six, after she had divorced your father and married Indonesian national Lolo Soetoro – where after arrival at Djakarta you both were temporarily refused admission by Indonesian authorities, who balked at your dual U.S.-Kenya nationality,” Archibald said in an open letter to Obama asking the President to release the information requested in the lawsuit. 

MORE HERE: http://www.clarkedailynews.com/berryville-man-files-federal-lawsuit-over-foia-response/27203/comment-page-1

US District Court Judge Reggie Walton is expected to schedule a hearing on the matter within the next 60 days.

Related Article: http://www.clarkedailynews.com/winchester-fbi-office-refuses-foia-request-on-obama-records/20583

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Congressional Research Service Releases Disinformation Report on Natural Born Citizen

Protecting Obama: Congressional Research Service Releases Error and Disinformation Ridden Report on Natural Born Citizen Requirement

Don Fredrick: My tentative entry for The Obama Timeline, to be posted later this evening:

The Congressional Research Service releases another (intentionally) error-ridden and deceptive report on the natural born citizen requirement, by legislative attorney Jack Maskell. The document is full of contradictions. (Maskell writes, “There is no provision in the Constitution and no controlling American case law to support a contention that the citizenship of one’s parents governs the eligibility of a native born U.S. citizen to be President.” Two sentences later he states, “…the eligibility of native born U.S. citizens has been settled law for more than a century…” If there is no controlling case law, how can the issue have been settled law for more than a century?) Maskell intentionally treats the terms citizenship at birth and natural born citizenship at birth as equivalent, when they are not. Predictably, Maskell misinterprets and misstates the Supreme Court cases United States v. Kim Wong Ark and Minor v. Happersett. Further, Maskell ridicules those who rely on the use of the term natural born citizen in Emerich Vattel’s Law of Nations, arguing that an English translation of the book was not published until after the adoption if the U.S. Constitution. The Founding Fathers did, in fact, rely on Vattel but, unlike Maskell, they understood French. (Maskell apparently believes that history is relevant only if written in English.)

With regard to Obama in particular, Maskell states that he is a natural born citizen as proven by his Hawaiian birth certificate and declares that sufficient because “…there appear to be no legitimate, official documentary records, or copies of such records, which have been produced or forwarded contradicting the prima facie record of …Obama’s birth in Hawaii, as provided in the official certification (or certificate) of live birth released by the Obama campaign in 2008 and attested to by Hawaii Department of Health officials, or the certified copy of the ‘long form’ birth certificate publicly shown and released on April 27, 2011.” Of course, evidence has been presented to the contrary, with more than a few document experts having shown that Obama’s birth certificates are fraudulent. Maskell claims, “No verified, official record of birth from any other jurisdiction or country has been produced; no contradictory health record or hospital record has been forwarded; and no official record of travel (such as a passport record) appears to exist placing …Obama’s mother in a foreign country at the time of [Obama’s] birth.” Conveniently, of course, Obama has seen to it that no one can access those records. Thus, on the one hand, Maskell argues that no one has provided passport records proving Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya. On the other hand, Obama has refused to allow anyone to access his mother’s passport records for the period in question. (Making contradictory evidence impossible to access certainly bolsters the case of one who claims that no such evidence exists.) That Maskell went to the significant trouble of preparing a 53-page eligibility document clearly suggests that Obama and his close supporters are fearful that the issue is not going away. Legislators will no doubt be given the document and told, “Just rely on this, and don’t even consider entertaining thoughts of ballot challenges.” The hidden message will be, “…even if you would rather see Hillary Clinton as the 2012 Democrat Party nominee.” (Interestingly, Obama had Maskell prepare a defense for his use in the court of public opinion, yet he has gone out of his way to avoid having the eligibility issue brought before the Supreme Court. Obama apparently believes he can continue to convince the voters that he is a natural born citizen, but does not believe he can persuade a majority of the Supreme Court Justices.)

I would prefer to post something more detailed but, of course, the Timeline is meant to provide readers with brief summaries of the day's Obama-related events. In the event anyone in the group produces a detailed rebuttal of Maskell's document, I will gladly post a link to it at my web site.

Don Fredrick

http://www.TheObamaTimeline.com

UPDATE: Comment from Atty Mario Apuzzo about the new Maskell CRS Memo from his legal blog: This new Jack Maskell memo is nothing but a cut and paste from Obot web sites. He stamps everything that breathes as a "natural born Citizen." Mr. Maskell is a master at hiding how he confounds and conflates a "natural born Citizen" with "citizen of the United States." I am working on some essays right now which I will be publishing shortly. After doing that, I will address Mr. Maskell's new memo.

FLASHBACK: Revealed: Members of Congress Internal Memo Leaked; What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - DETAILS HERE

Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement - 11/14/20

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Alabama Election Fraud Complaint Against Obama Submitted To Alabama Secretary of State

Alabama Election Fraud & Ballot Access Complaint Against Obama Submitted To Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman

Alabama Election Fraud Complaint Against Obama Submitted To Alabama Secretary of State - 11/29/2011

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Another Ballot Challenge Filed Against Obama Being Placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Another Challenge Filed Against Obama Being Placed on Georgia Primary Ballot

Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 11:59 PM
Subject: Formal Complaint

Dear Mr. Kemp,

As the Secretary of State for the Great State of Georgia in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Georgia; you had to qualify for the position you now hold. For the record I will respectfully remind you it can be found in the State Constitution:

Article V, Section III, Paragraph II
Qualifications. (a) No person shall be eligible to the office of the Secretary of State, Attorney General, State School Superintendent, Commissioner of Insurance, Commissioner of Agriculture, or Commissioner of Labor unless such person shall have been a citizen of the United States for ten years and a legal resident of the state for four years immediately preceding election or appointment and shall have attained the age of 25 years by the date of assuming office.

And just as you had to qualify for office before you could be elected, so too does the President of the United States. The qualifications for the Office of the President of the United States are in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

Article II, Section I, Clause V
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

As the Chief Elections Official for the State of Georgia it is your responsibility to
Supervise the elections process and guarantee the sanctity of the ballot.

In order to assure that you comply with this responsibility, the Georgia State Constitution stipulates that you had to take an oath to faithfully discharge your duties.

And might I also respectfully remind you that the United States Constitution, which is the law of the land; affirms that you are bound by that oath to support the U.S. Constitution:

U.S. Const. Article 6 Clause 3
Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant you the discretion to pick and choose which parts to uphold and which parts to ignore.

I would like to refer to a statement by The Honorable Sean Jerguson, Georgia Representative Dist. 22:

“I think we can all agree that we are a nation of laws, and we are governed by a nation of laws, and those laws are based on a framework and a foundation called the Constitution.”

Mr. Kemp, you are duty bound to guarantee that only a natural born Citizen as enumerated in Article II of the U.S. Constitution be allowed on the ballot in the Presidential election in 2012.

John Jay, our nation’s first Chief Justice in a letter on July 25, 1787 to George Washington; who at the time was presiding over the Constitutional Convention; said:

“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

And The U.S. Supreme Court in 1874 defined “Natural Born Citizen” in Minor v. Happersett as children born of two parents who are United States citizens:

"The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

The findings of the Supreme Court in 1874 was unanimous; with no dissention or opposition among the Justices as to the findings, and the definition has not changed.

Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born Citizen of the United States by virtue of his recognized allegiance to a sovereign foreign nation inherited from his father precluding him from eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States. Therefore, according to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution as defined in the United States Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happerset 88 U.S. 162 (1874) which set binding precedent, the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by an ineligible candidate.

Therefore I am officially filing a formal complaint as to Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility and request you remove him from the ballot.

Respectfully,

Kevin R. Powell

Previous challenge: Official Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama Being Placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot - DETAILS HERE

Another Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama Being Placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Official Ballot Challenge Filed Against Obama Being Placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Official Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama Being Placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

To: Georgia Secretary of State Brian P. Kemp

From: Carl A. Swensson

Attn: Mr. Brian Kemp

It has come to my attention your office has posted Barack Obama as the sole Democrat candidate for President on the Ga. Primary Ballot. This notice is my challenge and request he be removed from our ballot as he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the Natural Born Citizen status.

Jurisdiction falls squarely on the shoulders of your office as head of the Georgia Board of Elections and it is your sworn duty as a man of honor and Public Servant to protect and defend the Constitution. The very U.S. Constitution that is now under attack and assault by the DNC for having failed in their responsibility to submit an eligible candidate for inclusion on our ballot.

I have voiced this concern to you many times over the past year, citing Minor V Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875) but it would now appear as if those words of caution are going unheeded. Supporting SCOTUS cases have been scrubbed but are now re-surfacing thanks to the work of Leo Donofrio. Esq. and I would ask you and your research staff do your homework and look closely at Ex Parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894) (aka In Re Lockwood at Justia), is essentially the holy grail of support for Minor v. Happersett, as it states:

“In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, this court held that the word ‘citizen’ is often used to convey the idea of membership in a nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution as since…” (Emphasis added) and also the City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980)

I must bring these supporting cases for Minor V Happersett since your office has installed, as the chief arbiter, Former Central District U.S. Atty. Max Woods who has personally told me (see sworn affidavit attached) that even an “Anchor Baby” is eligible to hold the highest office in the land. I see this as an affront to the sensibilities of all Georgians and a fraud upon her citizens that only your office can now rectify.

Since we’re now talking of fraud, I must also add, to the mix, the use of a SS# from Connecticut by Mr. Obama (sworn affidavits from researchers Susan Daniels and Linda Jordan are attached) which was obtained while he was still living in Hawaii and still being used to this day. A number that, once plugged into the E-Verify database came back as not being verifiable.

The SS# discrepancy is worthy of investigation. His Naturalization, if it ever occurred, is another issue since he was officially adopted by Indonesian Lolo Soetoro (Attached research paper is from Stephen Pidgeon, Atty.). These additional two issues alone would constitute the need for further investigation and documentation from the DNC.

Admittedly, there is no Federal convening authority chartered with this responsibility which is why it falls squarely on the shoulders of this and every other State. You cannot fail us now and must uphold your Oath of Office by adhering to the Constitutional requirement that any candidate of the office of POTUS be a Natural Born Citizen. One of your main jobs is to make certain there is no election fraud. Do your Public service and be the man we elected to represent us.

The fear our Politicians feel, coming from the Media, can be a concern but, in no way, absolves the Ga. SOS’s office from doing its duty. There is no easy way around this so my request is a simple one… Man up, remove Mr. Woods from his involvement with this oversight committee and adhere to your Oath of Office by doing what every other Politician is afraid to do. Demand documentation, proving once and for all, that this man is either eligible or not. Based on what has been offered as such documentation, by the White House, he is not.

The eyes of the Nation are now upon you. Your timely response will be appreciated.

I have cc’d Sam Olens on this in the fervent hope he will initiated an investigation into Voter Fraud in the 2008 and upcoming 2012 elections. As the saying goes, “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me”.

Sincerely,

Carl A. Swensson

Affidavit - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Ga. SOS Challenge - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Pidgeon/Soetoro - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

NH Ballot Hearing was illegal: Commission members ILLEGAL campaign contributions

The reason Orly Taitz's NH Ballot Hearing was illegal: Commission members ILLEGAL campaign contributions

KenyanBornObamAcorn

Yes, Commissioner Jameson French, who is supposedly a Republican, made 4 contributions TO DEMOCRATS, while being on the ballot law commission and that is against the law.

NH BALLOT LAW COMMISSION

Section 665:3
"No ballot law commission member shall make a contribution, as defined in RSA 664:2, to any candidate for office or political committee."

Time to resign Mr French!



Previous reports on the NH ballot access challenge can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Demand for Emergency Rehearing of the Ballot Law Commission Regarding Obama's Ballot Access - Exhibits

New Hampshire Election Ballot Challenge Complaint Against Barack Obama - 11/13/2011

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Live Database Pull Linking Harrison Bounel to Obama's Bogus Social Security Number

Live Database Pull Linking Harrison J. Bounel Alias to Barack H. Obama's Bogus Social Security Number

Debt Collector & Skip-Tracer Al Hendershot

Al Hendershot: A database pull using the Obama alias Harrison J Bounel linking it to Barack H Obama's bogus social security number and linking the Obama alias to Michelle Obama as well. A direct search using "Bounel" in the state if IL was used in capturing this vital information that has never been exposed until now.

This alias is associated with his bogus CT social security number that he has been using since the 1970's. The alias is also associated with Michelle L Obama which lists her as Bounel's spouse as of 2011. Barack H Obama has committed a felony in the state of NH; furthermore, he has committed the same fraud in every state prior to the 2008 election and in the up-coming 2012 election. - VIDEO HERE



Obama's Alias Harrison J. Bounel Tied To Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number - DETAILS HERE

FOIA Release: Al Hendershot Video Promo Linking Barack Obama and Harrison J. Bounel - VIDEO HERE

http://TheObamaHustle.wordpress.com

Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Obama Defender, Fox News' Brian Kilmeade Taken To The Woodshed By His Listeners

BRIAN KILMEADE HAS TO BE EITHER THE MOST STUPID PERSON IN AMERICAN MEDIA TODAY...

OR HE IS THE MOST DISHONEST!...UNBELIEVABLE!...

BRIAN KILMEADE: STUPID OR JUST BLATANTLY DISHONEST? OR JUST FOLLOWING THE FOX TALKING POINTS.

THESE CALLERS GET IT! AMERICA IS CATCHING ON! KILMEADE MUST SLEEP WITH HIS HEAD UP HIS REAR END AND FORGETS TO PULL IT OUT IN THE MORNING!

WHAT PATHETIC RESPONSES...SO LAME!

CAN ANYONE REALLY BE THIS STUPID?

 http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Secret Service Special Agent: Why Is Obama Using Connecticut Social Security Number?

The birthers press on

Peter Lemiska @ Renew America

In a belated response to the birther movement, earlier this year the White House released Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate. Everyone believed it would finally silence the birthers; and it did — for a while. But since then, various independent researchers, as well as experts in graphics, computer software, and scanning equipment, have examined the document and now allege that it shows signs of tampering.

Since all of the countless lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility have been rebuffed by the courts, the birthers have set out on a new strategy. Arguing that Obama used fraudulent documents to establish his eligibility for the presidency in 2008, they are attempting to exclude his name from state election ballots for 2012.

Last Friday, Dr. Orly Taitz, a controversial attorney leading the charge in this effort, appeared before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to argue her case. The predictable decision came immediately. BLC Chairman, Brad Cook, proclaimed that "Our jurisdiction is to decide if a candidate on the ballot has properly filed and has been properly placed on the ballot." Case closed, Obama's name remains on the ballot. With all due respect to New Hampshire's BLC, we have to wonder if the state really needs an entire commission just to determine if a ballot was properly filed. Shouldn't it have the additional responsible of verifying the eligibility of a candidate, especially when serious questions are raised about possible fraud? At the very least, shouldn't the Attorney General or some law enforcement agency be tasked to investigate the charges?

And there certainly are legitimate questions that would be investigated if the accused were anyone but the President. Why, as Taitz and others have reported, has Barack H. Obama apparently used a Connecticut-issued Social Security number, if he has never had ties to that state? Why are there several other Social Security numbers associated with his name? Why has Obama fought so strenuously to conceal the original birth certificate, only to suddenly produce the document — a document of questionable veracity?

Critics of the birthers love to ridicule them as conspiracy nuts. While a few of them may be absolutely convinced that Barack Obama was born in a remote Kenyan village, many bright, honorable and reputable people do share with them serious questions about Obama's birth certificate, and his murky background.

At the other end of the spectrum are those who instinctively reject even the most compelling evidence of any scandal that might hurt Obama's presidency. To cling to their unshakable belief, they also have to reject some well-established facts. Document fraud and identity theft are real problems in this country. The Center for Immigration Studies suggests that as many as 75% of working age illegal aliens use fraudulent Social Security cards to obtain employment. Those fierce Obama loyalists dismiss even the suggestion that Obama's birth certificate may have been altered. When they cannot explain away any supporting evidence, they resort to ridicule. But it's not just a matter of defending their belief system. The whole issue of constitutional eligibility is simply inconsequential to them.

Yet for others, the questions remain.

Considering the availability of high-quality forged documents, is it at least possible that Obama's birth certificate could have been altered? In view of the absence of verification procedures by the various election committees, is it possible that candidate Obama was not properly vetted in 2008? And considering the power of the president, and his doting press, would it not be possible to conceal from the American people any skeletons that might be rattling in Obama's closet? 

CONTINUED HERE: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/lemiska/111123

Peter Lemiska is a freelance writer and former Senior Special Agent of the U.S. Secret Service. He has a BA degree in psychology.

Having spent more than 28 years in government, including eight years in the Air Force, he is deeply concerned about various issues affecting our society, particularly ethics in government.

Previous articles by Peter Lemiska here: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/lemiska

Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Article on Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number - DETAILS HERE

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Newly Released Video From Obama's NH Ballot Access Hearing: NH Reps Slam Committee

Newly Released Video From Obama's NH Ballot Access Hearing: NH Representatives Slam Committee Members - VIDEO HERE

Attorney Orly Taitz joined by 9 NH State Representatives, presidential candidate, veterans and other citizens seek a rehearing and if denied they will take the matter to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. Attorney Taitz points out the following in her motion:

"Previously, on multiple occasions, both you (NH Secretary of State William Gardner) and Ballot Law Commission, held substantive investigation into the background of the candidates and veracity of their statements and routinely removed from the ballot individuals, who are not eligible.(exhibit 1) As a matter of fact, a presidential candidate Sal Mohammad was removed from the ballot as ineligible during 2008 election season specifically for not being a natural born citizen(Exhibit 2)."

The complete motion for rehearing and exhibits can be read in full here. Previous reports on the NH Obama ballot access challenge can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. The original ballot complaint can be read here.



Demand for Emergency Rehearing of the Ballot Law Commission Regarding Obama's Ballot Access - Exhibits

New Hampshire Election Ballot Challenge Complaint Against Barack Obama - 11/13/2011

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Demand for Rehearing of the NH Elections Commission Regarding Obama's Ballot Access

Demand for Emergency Rehearing of the New Hampshire Elections Commission Regarding Obama's 2012 Ballot Access

Attention

William Gardner
Secretary of State
State of New Hampshire

Demand for emergency rehearing of the Ballot Law Commission complaint/election denial of challenge to candidate Barack Obama filed by attorney Dr. Orly Taitz and joined by 9 NH State Representatives (Exhibit 3), presidential candidate, veterans and other citizens, due to fraud committed by the members of the Ballot Law committee, their attorney and assistant Secretary of State of New Hampshire during the Committee hearing.

Dear Mr. Gardner,

according to Rules and Procedures of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, plaintiff, contesting decision of the administrative agency, needs to demand a rehearing by the agency prior to filing an appeal of its’ decision to the Supreme Court:

RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

PROCEDURAL RULES 1 TO 34

Rule 10. Appeal from Administrative Agency.

”To appeal to the supreme court from an administrative agency under RSA 541, the appealing party must have timely filed for a rehearing with the administrative agency. See RSA 541:4 and Appeal of White Mountains Education Association, 125 N.H. 771 (1984). The time period for the appeal does not begin to run until the administrative agency has acted upon the motion.”

Attorney Orly Taitz provided Ballot Law Commission with a 85 page complaint showing that candidate Barack Hussein Obama, II,(hereinafter Obama), citizen of Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia, is not a natural born citizen of the United States and does not possess valid US identification papers. in fact she provided you personally and the committee with affidavits and documents, that Mr. Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service certification a Connecticut Social Security number, which according to E-Verify and SSNVS was never assigned to Barak Obama. Additionally, she provided you with evidence showing Mr. Obama’s alleged true and correct copy of long form birth certificate, posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.gov, to be a cheap computer generated forgery, while the director of Health of the state of Hawaii is aiding and abetting Obama in obstruction of justice and is refusing inspection of the original birth certificate, allegedly on file.

Previously, on multiple occasions, both you and Ballot Law Commission, held substantive investigation into the background of the candidates and veracity of their statements and routinely removed from the ballot individuals, who are not eligible.(exhibit 1) As a matter of fact, a presidential candidate Sal Mohammad was removed from the ballot as ineligible during 2008 election season specifically for not being a natural born citizen(Exhibit 2).

On November 18th, 2011, during the committee meeting, members of the committee and their attorney simply shameslessly lied and committed the most egregious fraud by claiming that they only check, whether the candidate filled the declaration correctly and paid $1,000. Mr. Gardner, you personally, and members of the committee and attorney of the committee are well aware of all of the mentioned precedents, and are well aware, that verification of the candidacy according to law does not have a narrow meaning of checking, if the form is filled out and the check is paid. It includes verification, whether the candidate is indeed a Natural Born citizen, and Mr. Obama is clearly not a natural born citizen. even if mr. Obama were to possess a valid US long form birth certificate and a valid Social Security number, which he doesn’t, he cannot be considered a natural born citizen, as per prior fuling of the Supreme court of the United States in minor v Happersett, natural born US citizen is one, who is born in the country to parents, who are citizens. Mr. Obama had foreign citizenship since birth, since his father, Barack Obama Sr. was a foreign national and according to British nationality act Mr. Obama was a British citizen from birth.

Additionally, in spite of multiple demands, Mr. Obama’s declaration of candidate filed in 2011, was not provided to the plaintiff, while his prior declaration does not contain necessary wording of a sworn declaration, as eligible according to Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution, which in itself is a cause for removal of the candidate from the ballot, if indeed such necessary wording is missing.

Due to egregious fraud committed by the attorney of the committee and 5 members, who were sited at the hearing on November 18th, there is sufficient ground for a rehearing.

Ballot law committee consists of 10 members. Due to fraud committed by 5 members, present at the meeting, plaintiffs are demanding a re-hearing with 5 other members, not the same 5 members, who were engaged in egregious fraud. Office of the Secretary of state is requested to not to allow at the rehearing the same attorney, who was maliciously misrepresenting the requirements in regards to eligibility of the candidate.

Just like Al Capone was finally convicted when a corrupted jury was replaced, the state of NH and the US will have legitimate elections as corrupted members of the committee and their attorney are replaced.

Wherefore plaintiff is requesting:

1. Secretary of State Gardner to reconsider his decision and remove candidate Barack Obama from the 2012 elections ballot due to the fact, that Obama is not a natural born US citizen.

2. If Secretary of State Gardner refuses to remove Obama from the ballot, plaintiff is requesting a rehearing with a new Ballot Law commission, with remaining 5 commission members, who were not sited during the November 18, 2011 hearing, due to the fact that 5 committee members, who were sited during the November 18 hearing engaged in egregious fraud.

3. Due to the fact, that three of the committee members are reported to be licensed attorneys, plaintiff is requesting the Secretary of state sue sponte to report them and their attorney to the New Hampshire bar for a disciplinary hearing due to fraud committed by officers of the court.

4. Plaintiff is requesting Secretary of State to report to the Merrimack county District Attorney and Grand Jury 5 members of the Ballot Law Commission: Mr. Cook, Ms. Van Oot, Mr. French, Ms. Clemmons and Ms. Moran, as well as their attorney and assistant Secretary of State Ms. Ladd for fraud committed during November 18, 2011 hearing, as well as for misprision of felonies and aiding and abetting felonies committed by candidate Obama, as well as for possible treason against the state of Hew Hampshire and the United States of America.

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
11.22.2011 

COMPLETE NEW COMPLAINT WITH EXHIBITS HERE

COMPLETE ELECTION COMPLAINT POSTED BELOW OR HERE. EXHIBITS 1-4 HERE. EXHIBITS 5-9 HERE. 

Previous reports on the NH Obama ballot access challenge can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Video: Orly Taitz Vs. NH Elections Committee: The Complete Hearing Held On 11/18/11 - VIDEO HERE



Demand for Emergency Rehearing of the Ballot Law Commission Regarding Obama's Ballot Access - 11/22/2011

New Hampshire Election Ballot Challenge Complaint Against Barack Obama - 11/13/2011

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

New Hampshire Representatives Fire Back At House Majority Leader Over Obama Ballot Access

House majority leader dresses down 'birther'

Obama doubters to meet with O'Brien

By Matthew Spolar / Monitor staff

November 22, 2011

EXCERPT: Following the commission's decision (HERE) Friday, a group of House members requested a meeting with O'Brien to discuss their frustration over the board's dismissal of their complaint. Nine Republican state representatives have signed on to the complaint challenging Obama's candidacy in the Democratic primary: Harry Accornero of Laconia, Al Baldasaro of Londonderry, Susan DeLemus of Rochester, Laurie Pettengill of Glen, Larry Rappaport of Colebrook, William Tobin of Sanbornton, Moe Villeneuve of Bedford and Lucien and Carol Vita of Middleton.

O'Brien is scheduled to meet with the legislators in his State House office at 1 p.m. House Policy Director Greg Moore said O'Brien's job entails listening to the concerns of all 400 members of the New Hampshire House.

"Members can come in at any time they want and sit down with him," Moore said. "He'll give them a chance to come in and make their case."

Rappaport and Accornero denied in interviews yesterday that they are true "birthers," a term some view as pejorative that has been used to describe doubters of Obama's American citizenship. However, both said Obama hasn't definitively proved his citizenship despite releasing a long-form Hawaiian birth certificate earlier this year.

"What I've said repeatedly is I want an answer," Rappaport said. "The birth certificate that was released, that I saw at least, was a forgery. I can say that with complete confidence."

Accornero said he is more concerned with Taitz's claim that Obama's Social Security number was never assigned to him.

"When you tie the two together, you start questioning everything," Accornero said. "My main concern in this whole thing is to make sure that he was the person he says he was."

Rappaport said he was "not happy" about Bettencourt's email. Accornero said if Bettencourt wants to dismiss his concerns, "that's his problem." (SEE NH HOUSE MAJORITY LEADER BETTENCOURT'S EMAIL HERE)

"D.J. can think it's an embarrassment, but I'm sorry - I have a right to speak out," Accornero said. "I didn't give my power of attorney over to D.J. or the state of New Hampshire to speak out on national issues."

Accornero said he would be "remiss in my duty as a legislator" not to continue to question Obama's eligibility to seek the presidency. He hopes O'Brien agrees with his group's desire for further investigation into the Obama case, but he also wants to the state to adopt a more aggressive policy for investigating elections law complaints so future concerns like his don't get "swept under the rug."

"I would be just as insistent if it was for Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney," he said.

Baldasaro, chairman of the House Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs committee, said he hadn't seen Bettencourt's email.

"Any reaction I have, I'll talk to him face-to-face about it," Baldasaro said.

COMPLETE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/293962/house-majority-leader-dresses-down-birther

Previous reports related to the NH Obama ballot access challenge can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

New Hampshire Election Ballot Challenge Complaint Against Barack Obama - 11/13/2011

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Experts Discuss Obama's Birth Certificate and Connecticut Social Security Number

Experts Discuss Obama's Birth Certificate and Social Security Number

Tea Party Power Hour

Sign The Petition Demanding An Immediate Congressional Investigation Into Barack Obama's Forged Birth Certificate and Fake Social Security Number. Click Here!

Part 1

Jerome Corsi - Author of Where's The Real Birth Certificate?

Available from WND.com

Sheriff Joe Arpaio - Will join us to tell us more about his Cold Case Posse that is currently investigating the Obama birth certificate allegations.

Susan Daniels, the private investigator who broke the story regarding Obama's fraudulent social security number, will be on hand to describe in detail how she knows that Barack Obama's SSN was first issued to someone born in 1890.

Dean Haskins, Executive Director of the Birther Summit, will tell us about his upcoming event as well as his recent efforts to uncover more information regarding Obama's birth certificate.

Part II

Computer Experts Karl Denninger, Tom Harrison, and Mara Zebest return to discuss the problems with the electronic birth certificate released by Barack Obama.

Listen below or here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2011/11/19/experts-discuss-obamas-birth-certificate-and-ssn

Listen to internet radio with Mark Gillar on Blog Talk Radio

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

Private Investigator Susan Daniels: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number

Video: Private Investigator Susan Daniels; Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Fraud - VIDEO HERE



NEW: Numerous Experts Discuss Obama's Birth Certificate and Connecticut Social Security Number - AUDIO HERE

Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5