Sheriff Joe releasing more on Obama, attacks begin
'I have no intention of resigning'
Jerome Corsi @ WND
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio finds himself under increasing attack as he prepares to release new findings in his investigation of President Obama’s eligibility for the state’s 2012 election ballot.
“I have no intention of resigning,” said Arpaio, who is running for his sixth term as sheriff of Maricopa County. “They forget I have a four-decades long career in federal law enforcement that includes having been a special agent for the FBI and having worked for the Drug Enforcement Agency in the United States, as well as in Argentina, Turkey and Mexico.”
WND previously reported the intensity of attacks on Arpaio at both a state and national level.
Already, Arpaio has announced that his volunteer law enforcement investigation has found probable cause that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and his Selective Service registration form are forgeries. Arpaio and his team made the announcement at a March 1 press conference.
A second press conference is expected in the next few weeks to announce more findings Arpaio suggests will be explosive.
Last week, Arizona Republic columnist Laurie Roberts wrote a piece in which she reminded Arpaio of his pledge 20 years ago when he first ran as a candidate for Maricopa County sheriff to serve only one term and turn the office into an appointed post. Arpaio has said that his campaign pledge was a mistake, because if he reported to a political official, he would have been fired 20 years ago and not had the liberty to “do what I felt was right for the people that I serve.”
WND has previously reported that political operative Randy Parraz, a self-described “organizer,” has been running a determined campaign to oust Arpaio from office.
CONTINUED HERE: http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/sheriff-joe-releasing-more-on-obama-attacks-begin
HD VIDEO FROM 3/31 TEA PARTY EVENT WITH SHERIFF JOE POSTED HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html
-WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html -
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html


62 comments:
Hell to the YEAH, bring it on Sheriff Joe!! We should write him in for President!!! THIS MAN has balls the size of Montana! I cannot wait to hear the next news conference! And it's up to us to make it go VIRAL! Send it out to EVERYONE YOU KNOW and post it on every social network you're on! He's gotta go NOW!!!
So where did the "explosive" quote come from? Corsi?
Oh wait... right. It's in the WND article, but even there it is not in quotes. Once again, Corsi and WND are going to be too close to this and no one will take it seriously.
"A second press conference is expected in the next few weeks"? Why the delay? We can't affort to wait another few weeks! Arrgghhh!!!
No one in their right mind would believe a word this traitorous sheriff has to say. Arpaio isn't stupid. People who listen to him are. Unless he testifies, he continues stringing along anyone who'd listen. Arpaio is, and has been from the onset, a traitor.
Off subject, but can moderator look into this, since the Kontacr Me link doesn't seem to work.
Can someone verify the two billboards in the recent WND article:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/heres-how-to-ensure-obama-defeat/
The two billboards, Anniston Alabama and the Nashville one look to be photoshopped. I hate to accuse WND as I think they have been helping on the eligibility issue, but putting up bogus images does not help, especially if they are raising money for these billboards.
My problems with them are compared to the other billboards there is no shading, they are too bright. There is no 3d effect seen from wrapping billboard around sign. They are completely 2D. They do not sit behind the railing as they should, they also block out the advertisers sign on the billboard, which is not likely; look at other billboards on the way to work. They do not block their sign because that is how they get advertisement. You can cut and paste and scale the one from AL and its lettering fits exctly over the one from Nashville if you use opacity on it; this is not likely to happen as there should be some distortion from perspective. Finally, the Nashville one covers a pole which appears that the pole should be in front of the billboard otherwise the billboard would have to be attached to the pole for support. It also looks like cables near the top left of the Nashville one are cut off and missing.
So, can anyone verify these billboards? Preferably with their own pics even if the sign isn't still up? It would give us something to compare them too.
I totally disagree with this from Anonymous at 8:03PM:
Quote:
"So where did the "explosive" quote come from? Corsi?
Oh wait... right. It's in the WND article, but even there it is not in quotes. Once again, Corsi and WND are going to be too close to this and no one will take it seriously."
Corsi and WND have absolutely nothing to do with whether information from Sheriff Joe is being taken seriously...or not.
It's negative information about the Messiah, the One, Barry what's-his-name. It's not going to be taken serious by the admittedly in the tank for Obama media, or the in the tank for Obama media that doesn't admit it, like Fox News, no matter where it comes from.
I am glad Corsi and WND are all over this and I don't care if they make a few bucks off of it. I consider them to be be on my side, along with Sheriff Joe. The bashing that takes place here is coming mostly from Obots still trying to discredit any and all opposition to the Communist usurper squatting in the White House.
If Corsi says Joe is about to release explosive new information I believe him. How the information is treated by the Obamamedia isn't going to change, no matter where the information comes from.
I was hoping to learn who forged the illegal president's papers by now, but I'll settle for new findings. Bring 'em on and let's start kicking some ass.
BREAKING PROOF!!! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - LONG FORM BC A FRAUD!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fECpVS6DrQ&feature=g-vrec&context=G2552bd6RVAAAAAAAAAA
Uploaded by ppsimmons on May 31, 2011
ORIGINAL WND ARTICLE HERE!
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=303165
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DR. CORSI: SSA VERIFIED SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OBAMA USING NEVER ISSUED TO HIM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_Vvr5riXJ8&feature=related
THE FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY IS HERE AND NOW!!
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Aug 5, 2011
Dr. Corsi: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Is An Identity Theft Issue; SSA Verified Social Security Number Obama Is Using Never Issued to Him - http://www.BirtherReport.com
27:10 - Dr. Corsi states it is verified that the Social Security Administration did not issue the number of 042-68-4425 to Obama, and that "Obama" is using a stolen & an invalid & an illegal federal felony USA social security number!!!!!!!!!!! Dr. Jerome Corsi: Obama knows that he was NOT born in the USA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comments Under This Video:
How did this bozo hijack our country ? America! Rise up and let's take our country back!!
- dmhtuber 1 week ago
Corsi, got a P.H.D., from Harvard, he wrote the book about the swift boat story when John Kerry ran for President,.....he is a good man, I believe him,..... - rogueriverbob1
How long can this fraud stay in the white house? Where are the American people?
- mojoidol 6 months ago 2
Okay now we're getting someplace. We got to get our country back, who is this guy. Help us Orly, help us Corsi!!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? THE CASE THAT BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT BY JEROME R. CORSI, PH.D
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62786558/Obama-Wheres-the-Birth-Certificate-by-Jerome-Corsi#outer
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jon Lovitz slams Obama and Occupy Wall Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spd5cwlfRdk&feature=related
Rob
MUST SEE OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!
BREAKING PROOF!!! OBAMA BORN IN KENYA - LONG FORM BC A FRAUD!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fECpVS6DrQ&feature=g-vrec&context=G2552bd6RVAAAAAAAAAA
Uploaded by ppsimmons on May 31, 2011
ORIGINAL WND ARTICLE HERE!
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=303165
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DR. CORSI: SSA VERIFIED SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OBAMA USING NEVER ISSUED TO HIM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_Vvr5riXJ8&feature=related
THE FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY IS HERE AND NOW!!
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Aug 5, 2011
Dr. Corsi: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Is An Identity Theft Issue; SSA Verified Social Security Number Obama Is Using Never Issued to Him - http://www.BirtherReport.com
27:10 - Dr. Corsi states it is verified that the Social Security Administration did not issue the number of 042-68-4425 to Obama, and that "Obama" is using a stolen & an invalid & an illegal federal felony USA social security number!!!!!!!!!!! Dr. Jerome Corsi: Obama knows that he was NOT born in the USA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comments Under This Video:
How did this bozo hijack our country ? America! Rise up and let's take our country back!!
- dmhtuber 1 week ago
Corsi, got a P.H.D., from Harvard, he wrote the book about the swift boat story when John Kerry ran for President,.....he is a good man, I believe him,..... - rogueriverbob1
How long can this fraud stay in the white house? Where are the American people?
- mojoidol 6 months ago 2
Okay now we're getting someplace. We got to get our country back, who is this guy. Help us Orly, help us Corsi!!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? THE CASE THAT BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT BY JEROME R. CORSI, PH.D
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62786558/Obama-Wheres-the-Birth-Certificate-by-Jerome-Corsi#outer
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Next few weeks? What day? Or is it dependent on other news in need of a useless distraction?
@Matt
OMG. Do you really need anyone to verify that these signs were not printed – they were photoshopped into these photographs, Matt.
WND should just change their name to DNC.
QUESTION ...
I am confused and I mean no disrespect to Sheriff Joe when I ask ... is the posse's investigation ever going to culminate in more than ...
1.) a few press conferences
2.) more WND articles
3.) E-Books written by Corsi and the lead investigator Mike Zullo
Let me guess ... now that we have a third press conference coming, do I smell a "trilogy" coming down the pike?
An "arrest" would be a novel idea, but why would a posse (and Corsi) make an arrest when it is more lucrative to write and/or talk about it?
JC
John Doe, Corsi and WND's involvement and close ties to the alleged investigation is one of the major reasons why it is not now, nor will it ever been taken seriously. There is no appearance of impartiality. The Sheriff is a joke.
"Andrew Breitbart Murdered? Sheriff Joe Arpaio talked to Breitbart 4-5 Hours before he died"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G57Q3xrgxgo&feature=related
I would like to believe/trust in Sheriff Joe & Mike Zullo but it is difficult when it took over 6 MONTHS for them to make their initial findings, and now they refuse to present their findings to a District Attoney or Judge who are possibly the only way to get some actual action.
They should not say they have "explosive" new information if they don't in-fact have it NOW --- and IF they have it NOW, why not present it NOW.
WHY THE DELAY AGAIN ???
The closer the election gets, they more probability for (even an honest) judge to say that the "election" will handle the issue, or the likelyhood that a judge will delay his decision until after the election to avoid "distorting" the election.
But I do NOT want him "voted-out-of-office", that is too good for a traitor/criminal/ILLEGAL-ALIEN that will then get his pension and SS protection for the rest of his life.
I want him in JAIL .... NOW !!! Along with all the Democrat congress that KNEW about it the entire time, and the Republican congress that also enabled him, --- (read JOHN McCAIN) !!!
The announcement of an upcoming news conf. is peculiar. Elements of surprise with incriminating evidence are explosive. Why give the enemy time set up barriers? There are concerns of marketing value to continue info tasters.
If the GOP endorses Mitt/Rubio you'll have proof of complete conspiracy by ALL CONgress members with total disregard to Art2.Sec.1
I wonder why you don't think Corsi will be taken seriously. He has a more distinguished record at Harvard University, than your President!
A "traitor" for searching for TRUTH? I haven't ever heard that before!
Another Press Conference in the "NEXT FEW WEEKS"..!
OH GOODY GOODY! I can't wait...! We can all get together and have a real good time again while we PAY HOMAGE to Joe and his crew. Then we can pretend to be SHOCKED when the SERPENT CONTROLLED MSM totally ignores us... Maybe in another 2-3 mo. or so we can have another and do it again..!
WAKE UP MORONS, THE CLOCK IS TICKING..!
@Anonymous
So far he's not searched for anything, merely repeated what WND/CORSI have published for the last year or so.
@Anonymous
To Anon @2;37:
Charging a nominal fee for an e-book does not strike me as a lucrative proposition. Even if it were, which I doubt, when did it become wrong to make a buck on one's hard work?
Look at the lying rubbish the subversive proggie Left publishes and cashes in on these days to perpetuate the manufactured Obama narrative. That our side makes available in print or e-form that which attempts to get the truth out there is a good thing.
Those of us who have followed from jump Obama's usurpation are necessarily frustrated beyond belief. We come here and go to sites like WND each day hoping for that long awaited headline that will bring national attention to the truth. We need to bear in mind though that not every visitor to WND or ORYR is like us. Surely each day new readers are introduced to what to us is old news. Thus, rather than disparage them we should recognize that theirs is for the most part a thankless job and be grateful they are still out there acting as rare bullhorns for exposing Obama for what he is.
Finally, I for one am not going to throw barbs at Sheriff Joe. The number of press conferences and when he holds them is his call, and not something I wager he takes lightly. You may say you smell a 'trilogy,' but after reading your post I think I smell an obot.
@Matt I can tell you right off the bat that the Anniston, AL one is bogus. There are no Hancock Fabric or Tractor Supply stores in Anniston so that picture is another city, not Anniston. I'll be going there next week so I'll look around to be sure but as of this moment, those stores are not listed in their phone directory. I'm assuming the picture UNDER the city listed is the correct one??
Is this series of press conferences the SAME ANDREW BREITBART VETTING THAT NEVER HAPPENED?
This is a side show & Arpaio is the carnival barker & his non-broadcasted press conferences are likened to a traveling circus about to close.
He will not go to court with his "EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE" .
He will not mention the investigation on a tv interview. SOMEONE SHOULD ASK WHY HE DID NOT DISCUSS FORGERY DURING HIS FOX INTERVIEW!
Obama IIS NOT BLINKING & the time is waning.
Arpaio is sending a Message of Self-Preservation: the appearance is that this "exercise" is his re-election campaign.
He is keeping Corsi, WND & American Thinker in business, & nothing more than that.
10:20 AM could be right. Are we all being scammed to buy books and subscribe to newsletters or what?
@Matt
Nashville is up. I have seen it.
This whole thing has turned into Bozo's big top 2012. Where's the arrest? I won't believe anybody's serious about this until there's an arrest.
10:20, It is more than that. Knowingly buying the illegal more time makes Arpaio a traitor and a coward. In all fairness to the sheriff, traitor and coward only top the list.
I'm sticking with Sheriff Joe. I still think those who are slamming him here are Obots.
Obots who have changed their "strategery" a bit, but Obots just the same.
@Anonymous
"@Matt I can tell you right off the bat that the Anniston, AL one is bogus. There are no Hancock Fabric or Tractor Supply stores in Anniston...
"
I used Google Earth and found the Tractor Trailer place, Hancock and Payless in the image. I use the address for the tractor supply place. The only problem is there is no billboard in the image where it should be. Now the google images are from 2008, so it could have been built after. As far as the Nashville one, Tell it Like it is, can you get a photo. If you can, I'll put up an e-mail. I would like to see it for myself.
All WND did was place there billboard image over the real billboard so you can see it better. I would bet the farm that real billboard has WND's billboard on it. WND isn't that stupid to defraud the public when someone could easily drive by it and see it.
@Matt I can tell you right off the bat that the Anniston, AL one is bogus. There are no Hancock Fabric or Tractor Supply stores in Anniston so that picture is another city, not Anniston. Those stores are not listed in their phone directory.
**************
I don't know about the phone-book, but google list address and phone numbers for BOTH Hancock Fabric's and TSC Tractors.
AND ... I called both and CONFIRMED the billboard is there.
The REASON is looks "different" is that it is a lighted "LED" sign that rotates messages.
(The other one that looks whiter/fake is probably also an LED sign.)
YES there is BOTH a Hancock and TSC Tractor there.
I CALLED THEM BOTH and confirmed the sign is there and is a NEW SIGN (thus not on an "old" google-earth photo)
IT is also one of the newer LIGHTED "LED" signs and that explains why it looks whiter/fake.
(the other ones that look whiter/fake are also probably the new "lighted" signs that rotate messages)
I am not necessarly "slamming" Sheriff Joe, but I am CONFUSED.
I would like to think he is dedicated and just as patriotically American as I am ... but ... as I stated, I am CONFUSED.
WHY so SLOW ??? The first 6+MONTHS delay was unexceptable and now they state they HAVE "explosive" evidence but yet will not announce another news-conference for "weeks" ... WHY ... I am CONFUSED ???
WHY not present what they already have to the DA, and WHY not agree to present to a JUDGE what they have already announced publically anyway. I am confused ???
WHY be so insistent he is not accusing the "president" of anything ??? Obama may not have personally created the forgery, and indeed did not even personally present it. (he has never physically touched it on-camera)
BUT .... he is part of the criminal conspiracy in it's presentation to the public/world as his actual birth-certificate and it would be dis-ingenuous for him to attempt to deny culpability and knowledge it is fake.
And besides the actual (fake) birth-certificate means nothing anyway if he can't indeed PROVE he is even a US "citizen". (Illegal Alien)
So it is time to accuse the "president" ... IF charges are filed, and he refuses to cooperate, the president becomes guilty of "conspiracy to obstruct justice" which is what Nixon was accused of.
I mean if he is indeed not-guilty of being an ILLEGAL ALIEN, make him prove it in a court of law.
i was so blown away with the first press conference, i dont think i could handle the explosive one.
"I mean if he is indeed not-guilty of being an ILLEGAL ALIEN, make him prove it in a court of law."
In the U.S., if one is accusing someone the burden is on them, not the accused.
this is probably a marketing and advertising plan for a new book or something, media is constantly evolving.
Is all of this delay because the investigators fear being murdered? Is this what US politics has come to? Is the current regime in Washington playing out of a chapter of Soviet politburo pistol power tactics?
About Sheriff Joe's CCP . . . there isn't going to be an arrest. You can't arrest someone for putting up a phoney b.c. on the internet. You can only arrest someone for trying to use a phoney birth certificate.
Sheriff Joe's real purpose is to make Nobama look like a criminal without having to prove 100 percent that he is a criminal. His job is to keep throwing sh*t at the monkey and hope that some of it sticks to its fur. I've seen a lot of elections, and stinky monkies never get relected.
-I'm sticking with Sheriff Joe. I still think those who are slamming him here are Obots.
Oh, come on John. It's been almost a "YR". Now since we practically had to drag him kicking and screaming into this. Just how much time does he need..?! He's not one of us. He makes it a point to distance himself from the "KOOKY Birthers" every time he speaks.
"Oh, they came to me"... "What was I supposed to do..?" "I was looking to CLEAR the Prez".
Give me a break man! He literally APOLOGIZES for the investigation.
Besides what do we pay Sheriffs for...? To hold Press Conferences..?! Sheriffs are supposed to go out and ARREST people not TALK SHIT..! Look how long it took them to nail that bastard that posted the threats on ORYR. And all that guy did was just TALK. This SOB is USURPING the Republic, ENSLAVING the entire world, and taking us into WW3..!!!
Again, How much time do we give the Old Bastard before we question his integrity..?
You tell me.
@Anonymous
The Sheriff has had the dilemma of whom to give the evidence with expectation of action...the DoJ? ha!...Selective Service (which I believe is what he chose) ha! it's an Obama appointee who answers to him not to the Sheriff. I think he should go to the Postal Inspectors since they are more independent and good gumshoes and apparently Obama fooled around with the postmark date. Trouble is it's simply a hot potato no one wants to touch. The one who'll wind up with it will want to get rid of it as soon as possible, dissing all the hard and courageous fact gathering done by the few remaining patriots.
@MattOk well the Hancock Fabrics closed in 2007 so I don't know if that sign is still there or not. Also the Tractor Supply is not listed in the Anniston phone directory so I'm not sure if it's actually there or not, even though a citysearch says there's one there. Like I said, I'll be sure & check it out next week. I don't go to Nashville & it's not close enough to me to go on that fishing expedition. Picture is too generic anyway, so no way to know where that intersection is. I did download both pics and they have been edited in a photo program so who knows? I'll take my camera next week to Anniston & let you know. If you want to list a "generic" email address I can get in touch w/you after my trip. Totally up to you though.
Anonymous said...[Reply]
@Anonymous
- The Sheriff has had the dilemma of whom to give the evidence with expectation of action...the DoJ? ha!
Joe is a sheriff of Maricopa County AZ. If he has evidence of a crime his choices are 1) the county DA; 2) the AZ AG; 3) the FBI. And he knows it. There's no reason not to take it to one or all of these agencies if he truly feels he has evidence of a crime. The fact that the gives pressers rather than doing so should be telling.
- ...Selective Service (which I believe is what he chose) ha! it's an Obama appointee who answers to him not to the Sheriff.
He's not "chosen" anyone, much less the SS. All he did with the SS was write a letter... AFTER his first presser, knowing full well what the result would be. They were not going to send him anything, and he knew it. It was just for show. That part of an investigation should have been one of the first things they pursued. They replied and stated if he had evidence of a fraud/forgery/wrongdoing send it to them. Did he? No. He wrote another letter and demanded they reply in 10 days. LOL Like they give a shit what Joe Arpaio 'demands".
- I think he should go to the Postal Inspectors since they are more independent and good gumshoes and apparently Obama fooled around with the postmark date.
He could pursue that also. He hasn't and is likely not going to.
- Trouble is it's simply a hot potato no one wants to touch. The one who'll wind up with it will want to get rid of it as soon as possible, dissing all the hard and courageous fact gathering done by the few remaining patriots.
No legitimate investigative is going to end up with it... at least not from Joe or his "posse".
By their own admissioin they didn't bother to ask for cooperation from the HI DOH (as a law enforcement official that he is). Why? Well, because they "know" no document exists and HI DOH (so they say they were told by HI law enforcement, but they're presented no evidence of such) that they would just stall them anyway. BS. That is not how investigations are conducted. I know it, you know it, everyone here and everywhere else knows it.
He's presented nothing that was not already widely on the internet, and has done nothing but promote WND/CORSI/FARAH. That's it.
He's done no investigation. He's neither named any "experts" (and the named ones are not qualified in digital forensics, and their testimony would never see the light of day in court as experts) nor presented anything any "new" experts that he supposedly had investigate have put forth.
The facts show there are two reasons he's holding pressers rather than moving forward. 1) he's attempting to use this "investigation" as leverage against both the civil suit and potential criminal charges against him by the DOJ... not. gonna. work. And 2) as campaign rhetoric for his upcoming re-election.
Many may certainly disagree, but based on the evidence and facts I see re Arpaio/Zullo/Corsi, et al. and this "investigation," that's my take on it.
I personally CALLED TSC Tractors and the guy there CONFIRMED the sign is there.
It is one of the new "lighted LED" signs with rotating messages.
Why are these idiot obots given a pulpit here?
I have to say that I am both surprised and disappointed by the fact that ... "if anyone dare questions anything in reference to Sheriff Joe's possee, we are called an Obot"!
1.) Name calling
2.) Mindless, zombie-like following
3.) placing the posse and/or Sheriff Joe in a Messiah-like role
... AND THEY WANT TO CALL US OBOTS!!!!!
I know that we have a mere 7 months until the 2012 election, so "call me crazy" but a
1.) a few press conferences
2.) more WND articles
3.) E-Books written by Corsi and the lead investigator Mike Zullo
.... IS NOT GOING TO BRING DOWN OR STOP OBAMA!
I agree with others on this site that Sheriff Joe has quite the dilemma in reference to "who does he pass on the evidence to"??? Ultimately, I fear that it is going to boil down to nothing short of a revolution by "we the people"!
JC
"All WND did was place there billboard image over the real billboard so you can see it better. "
Then why did they "forget" to mention that? Ethics of journalism doesn't seem to be WND's strongest suit (apart from not showing any love for Dear Orly).
- Trouble is it's simply a hot potato no one wants to touch.
No one has the BALLS to touch. This is why ORLY is the LEADER (Like it or not) of the movement.
-The one who'll wind up with it will want to get rid of it as soon as possible, dissing all the hard and courageous fact gathering done by the few remaining patriots.
If you ain't gonna do shit with it, then take it to someone who has more BALLS than you and WILL..! "TESTIFY" in Orly's case. If not then you're just another USELESS COWARD under Serpent Controll.
-No legitimate investigative is going to end up with it... at least not from Joe or his "posse".
Hope you're wrong, but must agree. If he hasn't done it by now, he's not going to.
-The Sheriff has had the dilemma of whom to give the evidence with expectation of action...
Orly is waiting, Case active, Discovery on...
@Anonymous April 24, 2012 4:44PM
"In the U.S., if one is accusing someone the burden is on them, not the accused."
In the State of Georgia, if someone's eligibility to be on an election ballot is challenged the burden is on them, not the challenger.
I suggest that in EVERY situation where certain requirements must be met, the burden of proof is on the applicant to prove he/she meets those basic requirements.
(educational/experience/CITIZENSHIP-GREEN CARD/drug-free requirements for jobs, age for drivers-license, school-entry, sports, military, etc.)
I would think the responsibility for such vetting for President rests on the political party, (ala DNC - PELOSI and REID).
The evidential PROOF that Pelosi was AWARE he was not eligible lies in the fact she omitted the "constitutionally eligible" clause from her affirmations to the state SoS's; (except for Hawaii after they refused to accept it without the legal back-up of her verification of eligibility added to their submittal).
All this evidence, all this investigation, a Posse with subpoena power, and they still can't find enough to charge anybody with anything?
I wouldn't mind a refund of my donations, Mister America's Toughest Sheriff.
@Commykiller
What case, exactly, would that be?
And don't say MS, because it's not.
It seems Harvard brass is too stupid to spot a fake ss# then what does that say about Corsi ?
Sarcasm.
-What case, exactly, would that be?
And don't say MS, because it's not.
What's wrong with MS..?! If you don't like that one, PICK ONE, she has around 6 at last count.
Anyway the point is Moot because they have already refused to testify TWICE. So what difference does it make, WHAT CASE...
Shit, if they were willing Orly would start a whole NEW case just for them at the drop of a hat..! Aaaand you know thaaat..!
- What's wrong with MS..?! If you don't like that one, PICK ONE, she has around 6 at last , count.
The state court case is MS is stayed, as it has been removed to federal court. She's already f'd that case up beyond recognition, and she added to her FUBAR in a letter sent to the court yesterday.
She has one open case in IN that won't be open long. She has Astrue and Ruemmler. No testimony is going to be taken in those... purely matters of law. Plus I *think* both are at the appeal stage.
- Anyway the point is Moot because they have already refused to testify TWICE. So what difference does it make, WHAT CASE...
Anyway, the bottom line in Arpaio/Corsi/Zullo and the "posse" are never going to testify. They are not going to subject themselves to cross-examination. None of their so-called experts are experts in the required fields and their testimony would never be allowed as experts in a court of law.
In addition is the fact that if she ever got to discovery she'd be clueless how to conduct it, and the GA hearing proves she has no idea how to conduct a witness examination, along with many other things that were revealed there she's hopelessly clueless about when it comes to legal knowledge/practice.
Pinning hopes on Orly when it involves anything legal is just delusional wishful thinking.
"GA hearing proves she has no idea how to conduct a witness examination."
******************
Considering she was limited to 1/4 the original time she was to be allowed, I think she did a GREAT job in GA, and prior to that NH.
I have seen worse attorneys, much worse.
It is a judges job to rule on the MERITS without consideration of the competency of the attorney, and an HONEST judge will do that.
(Honestly, is there ANY lawyer that could have overcome an Obama/federal promise of 2 NUCLEAR REACTORS to GA - the first approvals in 35 years ???)
Judge Wants Definition of Natural Born Citizen: Obama's Eligibility Important and Not Trivial
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/judge-wants-definition-of-natural-born.html
Anonymous 6:42 "John Doe, Corsi and WND's involvement and close ties to the alleged investigation is one of the major reasons why it is not now, nor will it ever been taken seriously."
Well, you take it seriously, you wouldn't be on here trying to convince people it wasn't serious if that weren't the case. Everybody that has been following this issue since 2008 realizes the seriousness of a law enforcement agency validating the very things we have known for a long time, including OBOTS. People ain't buying your claims anymore man, time for a new act.
- Considering she was limited to 1/4 the original time she was to be allowed, I think she did a GREAT job in GA, and prior to that NH.
Which statement only goes to cement the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to legal proceedings. And she did not take anywhere near the time she was allotted, though it would not have mattered.
-I have seen worse attorneys, much worse.
They must be real doozies then. I've been in this game for over 40 years and I've never seen a more incompetent attorney in all aspects of legal practice. Phil Berg comes in a close second.
- It is a judges job to rule on the MERITS without consideration of the competency of the attorney, and an HONEST judge will do that.
And he did.
Jack Van Impe -- The Truth About Hell 1 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m03BbUBY4A&feature=relmfu
Uploaded on May 8, 2011
"Reclaiming and Restoring Biblical Christianity"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jack Van Impe -- The Truth About Hell 2 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0i8YM7NFs54&feature=relmfu
Uploaded on May 8, 2011
"Reclaiming and Restoring Biblical Christianity"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
That Video is no longer available...I wonder why???
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.