Constitutional Attorneys and Advocates Respond to Brett Baier’s
Unconstitutional Definition of Natural Born Citizen
Article II Super PAC Email
Following is a snapshot from constitutional voices from across the web who weighed in on Fox News Brett Baier’s unconstitutional definition of “natural born Citizen”. These statements are concise, factual and rooted in constitutional law. After reading them, keep them and use them to help advance Article II Super PAC’s goal to educate a majority of voters before the November elections. The electorate must be informed and we are counting on you to help us educate a majority of the voters with the facts.
Herb Titus, Esq.
William J. Olson, P.C.
“Bret Baer commits a common error. He assumes that "natural born citizen" means the same thing as "citizen by birth." They are not the same. A citizen by birth is one who by constitutional or statutory provision is made or recognized as a citizen based upon where or to whom he was born. Under Mr. Baer's view, a natural born citizen, then, is a citizen of a particular nation only by positive law. If a natural born citizen is defined by statute, as Mr. Baer claims he is, then by statute Congress can take away his natural born citizenship status, subject only to the 14th Amendment's definition of citizenship by birth. And even that citizenship can be taken away by an amendment to the constitution. Indeed, according to Mr. Baer, no one could have been eligible to be elected president UNLESS Congress passed a statute designating one's citizenship by birth, or until the 14th amendment definition of citizenship by birth was ratified.”
“A natural born citizen, by contrast, is not dependent upon Congress passing a statute or the constitution being amended. A natural born citizen is a citizen of a specific nation by the law of nature of citizenship. The law of nature of national citizenship is written into the very nature of the universe of nation-states, and is universal as to place, uniform as to person, and fixed as to time. By definition the law governing natural born citizenship exists independent of any human power, legislative or otherwise. That is why "natural born citizenship" is not defined in the Constitution. Such citizenship exists whether recognized by positive law or not. Such citizenship is God-given. To qualify one must be born to a father and a mother each of whom is a citizen of a particular state in order for the person to be "natural born" citizen of that state.”
###
Van Irion, Esq.
Liberty Legal Foundation
“Many of you have e-mailed about Fox News anchor Brett Baier’s claim that Obama is constitutionally qualified simply because he was born here. It should be clear that Mr. Baier is speaking beyond his knowledge. He is quite wrong. His comments displayed his ignorance about the basic structure of our government.”
“Congress cannot override the Constitution, or re-define any term in the Constitution, without going through the entire Amendment process. Anyone that claims that Congress re-defined “natural born citizen” as anyone born on U.S. soil, simply demonstrates their ignorance of how our government works. Congress simply doesn’t have the authority to re-define Article II “natural born citizen” without Amending the Constitution. Any attempts by Congress to do so are without effect. Congress has authority to make anyone born here a citizen, but they cannot re-define “natural born citizen” without Amending the Constitution.”
“Secondly, the 14th Amendment expanded who could be a citizen, not who could be a natural born citizen. If the framers of the 14th Amendment had wished to redefine "natural born citizen" they would have used that term in the Amendment. They did not. Therefore the 14th Amendment ONLY applies to the larger class of citizens, not the smaller class of "natural born citizens."
###
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
Apuzzo Law Firm
“He fails to understand that “Citizens of the United States” and their “natural born Citizen” children already existed since after July 4, 1776 and before the Constitution was adopted in 1787. The Founding generation knew who those citizens were. That generation abandoned the English feudal and monarchial notion of subjecthood and perpetual allegiance to the King. They replaced the notion of membership in the civil society by calling their members “citizens” and “natural born Citizens” rather than “subjects” and “natural born subjects” and providing that children followed the political condition of their parents who by free will selected that condition for them until their age of majority at which time they were free to accept or change that choice, not that of some King without choice and for life. While the Constitution itself does not define a "natural born Citizen," historical evidence and case law from the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts do so. That evidence shows that a "natural born Citizen" is a child born in the United States to parents who at the time of their birth were both either "natural born Citizens" or "citizens of the United States." See my blog at http://puzo1.blogspot.com for a discussion of this historical evidence and case law.”
Read the rest of Apuzzo’s statement by clicking – http://puzo1.blogspot.com
Jerome Corsi
World Net Daily
“Baier incorrectly interprets that 8 USC Section 1401 was written to define ‘natural born citizen,’ as specified in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution,” he said. “The purpose of 8 USC Section 1401 is to define ‘nationals’ and ‘citizens’ of the United States ‘at birth.’”
Corsi explained that citizens at birth are not “natural born citizens” under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1.
“Nowhere in 8 USC Section 1401 does Congress make any mention of the term ‘natural born citizen’ or to Article 2, Section 1,” Corsi said.
He went onto say “To novices, the distinction between ‘citizen at birth’ and ‘natural born citizen’ may be trivial. Under law, the distinction is meaningful and important. A mother who takes advantage of ‘birth tourism’ to fly from Turkey or China (or any other foreign country) to have a baby born in the United States might arguably give birth to a ‘citizen at birth,’ under the meaning of the 14th Amendment, extended by 8 USC Section 1401,” Corsi said.”
“But consider that the mother and child return to China and Turkey and raise the child. The child does not learn to speak English and does not learn anything about U.S. history or culture. Yet at age 35, the child returns to the U.S., spends the necessary years here to meet the residency requirements under Article 2, Section 1, and runs for president.”
“He continued, “‘Natural Born Citizen’ is a term of natural law — it specifies that a child must be born in the USA to two parents who were U.S. citizens at birth.”
Read the rest of the Unruh article by clicking
- http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/law-prof-fox-anchor-wrong-on-eligibility/
###
Dan Crosby
The Daily Pen
“Unfortunately, Baier is wrong and misguided. Those he defines here are not Natural born citizens. A natural born U.S. citizen is one born in the United States, specifically defined as a geographic location held under the constitutional protection of the U.S., to two U.S. citizen parents, conditions which are well defined by the tenets of natural law and national identity.”
“Again, this is another example of a politically-minded individual desperately seeking an extralegal mooring upon which to anchor their opinion about Obama’s eligibility. Unfortunately for Baier, that mooring is not found there,” says TDP Editor, Pen Johannson.”
Read the rest of Crosby’s response by clicking - http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/05/fox-news-baier-typifies-mainstream.html
###
Cindy Simpson
American Thinker
“A recent Human Events article by Michael Zak asserts the same position as Baier's. No citizen parents are needed, and they can be here illegally. Even al-Awlaki could have run for president.”
“The Georgia Obama ballot challenge ruling and its likely consequences on citizenship arguments was discussed here, which we now see in action.”
“Baier's assertion places both Obama with his one citizen parent and Rubio with none on the same "natural born" bus -- and that bus ran over not just "birthers" (who actually have been lying under there for quite a while), but also all of the Republicans who have been working for curtailment of the "jackpot" birthright practice as part of effective immigration reform. Because now it can no longer be denied (which "birthers" have been arguing all along) that birthright citizenship and presidential natural born eligibility are inextricably related.”
Read the rest of Simpson’s article by clicking - http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/rubio_and_birthright_citizenship.html#ixzz1u2bQXWRm
###
Lastly we hear from Commander (Ret) Charles Kerchner challenging Baier in an “Open Letter” to include constitutional attorney’s who are leaders on Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 to have a seat at the table IF Baier assembles such a panel –
Dear Mr. Baier:
I strongly suggest you invite constitutional scholar and attorney Herb Titus and constitutional presidential eligibility attorney Mario Apuzzo on to any debate or discussion panel you put together to debate the true legal and historical meaning of the Natural Law legal term of art “natural born Citizen”. Invite anyone else you wish on to the panel who wishes to argue that the natural law “natural born Citizen” legal term of art is 100% synonymous with the man-made positive law, Congressional Statute Title 8 Section 1401, “Citizen at Birth” legal term, which is what you asserted. Our experts will conclusively prove to you and your listeners in any debate form or forum you choose that those two citizenship legal terms/types are not identically the same.
Read the rest of Kerchner’s Open Letter by clicking - http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/an-open-letter-to-mr-bret-baier-of-fox-news-from-cdr-kerchner-ret
Help Article II Super PAC spread the word on the definitive definition of “natural born Citizen” by sharing our updates with your friends, family, colleagues, Facebook Friends and Twitter pals. We are counting on you to help us educate the voters now!
HD VIDEO FROM 3/31 TEA PARTY EVENT WITH SHERIFF JOE POSTED HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html
-WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html -
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
25 comments:
These guys must do more than post responses on the Internet. Special Report is actually the only news progam I consistently watch anymore, and I love what y'all are doing but until you win over the media you will never succeed, and SR is the only place you have a chance. Bret Baier actually paved the way.
I seriously hope Mario and everyone send certified letters to Special Report - with appropriate documentation - and officially request a panel discussion.
What would be even more powerful if you all agree collectively, pool your resources, and all sign the document together.
And you will have to do it immediately.
The address: Special Report c/o Fox News, 400 N Capitol St NW, #550, Washington, DC 20001
I hope you have all gotten together and collectively issued ONE document that spells out your reasoning on constitutionality, with appropriate documentation and citations. Get Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Dan Crosby to add a contribution showing reasonable doubt to the birth certificate authenticity.
COLLECTIVELY sign it and send it to Fox News immediately via certified mail, with a prior phone call.
Better yet, hand-deliver it.
We are lucky in that Bret Baier (whom I hold a lot of respect for) opened the door for you. This is your LAST CHANCE to win media support from the most dominant conservative TV news channel in media; if you cannot win their support you will never win legal support.
Send to Special Report c/o Fox News, 400 N Capitol St NW, #550, Washington, DC 20001
While you're at it, send a copy to Rush Limbaugh at The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1270 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Just across the river from Mario's office. Rush is the undisputed king of conservative media and he also has held the door open for a couple of years now if you would only walk through it. Send a one-page fax with the gist of your stuff to 212-445-3963.
Again - time is running out. You only have a few more days to act at most.
As for the rest of us - if it is not too late, do "Operation Chaos" and vote for the OTHER GUY in the DEMOCRATIC primary in your state. Go to thegreenpapers.com and scroll down to find your state (Texas is an open primary), the candidaates, whether the primary is open or if you can still change registration and screw up the convention process. Find the date of your state Democratic convention and go protest it. Make it (respectfully) ugly for them.
The Fox commentator is utterly like his counterparts...someone who has, personally and professionally, taken no time to examine what many millions have. He assumes those born 14th amendment citizens are in fact natural born. Forgivable if it weren't for the context of his chosen profession and power to influence. Perhaps someone should ask him if he actually tasked his investigative staff or if he personally thought the matter beneath such consideration and the research irrelevant to his "informed" assertion on natural born citizenship and Obama's eligibility.
The Fox commentator is utterly like his counterparts...someone who has, personally and professionally, taken no time to examine what many millions have. He assumes those born 14th amendment citizens are in fact natural born. Forgivable if it weren't for the context of his chosen profession and power to influence. Perhaps someone should ask him if he actually tasked his investigative staff or if he personally thought the matter beneath such consideration and the research irrelevant to his "informed" assertion on natural born citizenship and Obama's eligibility.
"OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN QUIETLY SENDING MISSIVES TO THE SUPREME COURT THREATENING [THE SUPREME COURT] THAT IF IT DOESN'T RULE IN HIS FAVOR ON OBAMACARE, MEDICARE WILL FACE DISRUPTION AND “CHAOS.”
"DICTATOR OBAMA ISSUES NEW THREAT TO SUPREME COURT OVER OBAMACARE"
Sher Zieve
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Excerpt:
"As an additional example of Obama’s illegal and (I believe) highly treasonous behaviors, on 1 May and 2 May Obama issued two additional unconstitutional and illegal Executive Orders. The first E.O., issued 1 May 2012, makes the USA subject to “international regulations” as opposed to looking to and following the US Constitution. Also, with this new E.O., the US FDA will now be able to be bypassed by International committees—thus, replacing the FDA with any international group which may be chosen. In essence, Obama is quickly eliminating US Sovereignty and selling the USA to the international “community.”
The second E.O. issued in 2 days was signed by Obama on 2 May 2012. This E.O. instructs the USA to bow to international regulations instead of the US Constitution and Businessweek reports: “Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.” This also brings the USA closer to becoming a “North American Union” and—also—eliminating its sovereignty—in toto.
Suffice it to say, no one in Congress has issued even the proverbial “peep” over either of these illegal “orders.” Do the American people really want to continue to live under this blatant tyranny?
"The second question is “Will the Supreme Court of the United States of America bow to Obama and give up its co-equal status to the dictator as the US Congress has already done?” If so, perhaps its time for We-the-People to recruit the Honduran Supreme Court who, along with their military, ousted its then President Manuel Zelaya who had become a dictator. Oppression under the Obama syndicate becomes worse each and every day, folks. Will we ever choose to go back to the sunshine?"
Please Continue Reading The Entire Article Here:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46448
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"OBAMA: "WE'VE BEGUN TO SEE WHAT CHANGE LOOKS LIKE" — AMERICA: “NO THANKS, BARACK!"
Kelly O'Connell
Sunday, May 6, 2012
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4650
The Supremes should counter this threat by clearly defining NBC status. That should shut Barky up.
MUST WATCH OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!
“ATTORNEY GENERAL: OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE THE GREATEST SET OF LAW-BREAKERS IN OUR LIFETIMES!!!”
“REPORTS 21 SPECIFIC LAW VIOLATIONS!!! “THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!” – VIDEO
March 8, 2012
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
“This pResident and his administration in my view represent the greatest set of law-breakers that have run the federal government in our lifetimes.
The fact is, pResident Obama and his appointee’s have ignored federal laws, they’ve ignored binding rulings of federal courts, and they’ve ignored the limits on their power mandated by the constitution.”
Lou Dobbs: [...] “What is going on? [...] What is the recourse that you hope to achieve here?”
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
“Well, there’s two things going on here. We compiled all of these violations of the law that we’re all contending with around the country, to make the point that American’s need to understand fully what’s at stake in November, if they choose to vote to re-elect this pResident.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S AT STAKE – IS THE RULE OF LAW ITSELF. ‘Cause I wasn’t kidding with the statement that you ran there before, WE’RE TALKING ABOUT THE LEVEL OF LAW-BREAKING IN THIS ADMINISTRATION.
THESE AREN’T JUST DISPUTES ABOUT, “Well you see it one way, and we see it another way.” For instance, take the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission went into try to regulate the Internet.
A COURT TOLD THEM IN AN ORDER, “You don’t have the authority to do that.” They went back in the same year and said, “Well, we’re going to do it any way!!!!," IN THE FACE OF A COURT ORDER THAT THEY DIDN’T APPEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
These are “the pResident’s” appointee’s!!!!!
In that instance, it isn’t just their opinion versus some other lawyer, in my case an attorney general, IT’S — A - COURT - HAS RULED, AND THEY HAVE IGNORED THE RULING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And so now some private parties are going back to court with them over that. WE’RE GOING TO HELP THOSE PRIVATE PARTIES FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE TO RE-ESTABLISH THE RULES OF LAW THERE.
We can rattle off examples from the EPA which I’ve taken to calling the “Employment Prevention Agency” because they’re so good at that, BUT THEY HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW.
THESE ARE NOT POLICY DIFFERENCES, THESE ARE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW. And the pResident has created a corporate culture in his administration, that is very comfortable not merely pushing the boundaries, but completely trampling them, be they constitutional or legal.”
Lou Dobb: [...] “[T]he assault on religious freedom initiated by this administration [...]. THIS IS REMARKABLE FOR ANY ADMINISTRATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
“IT IS TRULY UNPRECEDENTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! People are used to hearing hyperbole in election years. The numbers don’t lie. I mean just in the report we compiled there were over 20 violations of the law, [of "Obama" and his administration] and just Last week, Virginia and Texas were in the DC circuit court of appeals here, on behalf of 15 states [...].
[...] [A]nd the EPA came in and said, “OH NO, YOU’RE GOING TO DO IT OUR WAY, OR NO WAY!!” AND THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE KNOCKED THEM BACK. THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW OVER AND OVER IN STATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.”
Lou Dobbs: “As always, it is good talking with you. We appreciate it.”
MUST WATCH VIDEO:
http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/03/08/lou-dobbs-report-details-21-legal-violations-by-obama-admin/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MUST SEE OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!
“JUDGE NAPOLITANO: SUPREME COURT WILL THROW OUT ENTIRE STATUTE” (VIDEO)
March 29, 2012
“FNC senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on the Supreme Court’s hearings on the health-care law and why the Justices will likely throw out the entire health-care law.”
MUST SEE VIDEO:
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1537342181001/napolitano-supreme-court-will-throw-out-entire-statute/?intcmp=obinsite
MUST WATCH OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!
“ATTORNEY GENERAL: OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE THE GREATEST SET OF LAW-BREAKERS IN OUR LIFETIMES!!!”
“REPORTS 21 SPECIFIC LAW VIOLATIONS!!! “THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!” – VIDEO
March 8, 2012
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
“This pResident and his administration in my view represent the greatest set of law-breakers that have run the federal government in our lifetimes.
The fact is, pResident Obama and his appointee’s have ignored federal laws, they’ve ignored binding rulings of federal courts, and they’ve ignored the limits on their power mandated by the constitution.”
Lou Dobbs: [...] “What is going on? [...] What is the recourse that you hope to achieve here?”
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
“Well, there’s two things going on here. We compiled all of these violations of the law that we’re all contending with around the country, to make the point that American’s need to understand fully what’s at stake in November, if they choose to vote to re-elect this pResident.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S AT STAKE – IS THE RULE OF LAW ITSELF. ‘Cause I wasn’t kidding with the statement that you ran there before, WE’RE TALKING ABOUT THE LEVEL OF LAW-BREAKING IN THIS ADMINISTRATION.
THESE AREN’T JUST DISPUTES ABOUT, “Well you see it one way, and we see it another way.” For instance, take the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission went into try to regulate the Internet.
A COURT TOLD THEM IN AN ORDER, “You don’t have the authority to do that.” They went back in the same year and said, “Well, we’re going to do it any way!!!!," IN THE FACE OF A COURT ORDER THAT THEY DIDN’T APPEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
These are “the pResident’s” appointee’s!!!!!
In that instance, it isn’t just their opinion versus some other lawyer, in my case an attorney general, IT’S — A - COURT - HAS RULED, AND THEY HAVE IGNORED THE RULING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And so now some private parties are going back to court with them over that. WE’RE GOING TO HELP THOSE PRIVATE PARTIES FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE TO RE-ESTABLISH THE RULES OF LAW THERE.
We can rattle off examples from the EPA which I’ve taken to calling the “Employment Prevention Agency” because they’re so good at that, BUT THEY HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW.
THESE ARE NOT POLICY DIFFERENCES, THESE ARE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW. And the pResident has created a corporate culture in his administration, that is very comfortable not merely pushing the boundaries, but completely trampling them, be they constitutional or legal.”
Lou Dobb: [...] “[T]he assault on religious freedom initiated by this administration [...]. THIS IS REMARKABLE FOR ANY ADMINISTRATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
“IT IS TRULY UNPRECEDENTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!! People are used to hearing hyperbole in election years. The numbers don’t lie. I mean just in the report we compiled there were over 20 violations of the law, [of "Obama" and his administration] and just Last week, Virginia and Texas were in the DC circuit court of appeals here, on behalf of 15 states [...].
[...] [A]nd the EPA came in and said, “OH NO, YOU’RE GOING TO DO IT OUR WAY, OR NO WAY!!” AND THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE KNOCKED THEM BACK. THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW OVER AND OVER IN STATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.”
Lou Dobbs: “As always, it is good talking with you. We appreciate it.”
MUST WATCH VIDEO:
http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/03/08/lou-dobbs-report-details-21-legal-violations-by-obama-admin/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MUST SEE OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!
“JUDGE NAPOLITANO: SUPREME COURT WILL THROW OUT ENTIRE STATUTE” (VIDEO)
March 29, 2012
“FNC senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on the Supreme Court’s hearings on the health-care law and why the Justices will likely throw out the entire health-care law.”
MUST SEE VIDEO:
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1537342181001/napolitano-supreme-court-will-throw-out-entire-statute/?intcmp=obinsite
"JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO SAYS COURT WILL STRIKE DOWN OBAMACARE (VIDEO)"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=5h2hKzimIyo
WHEN IS OBUM GOING TO BE ARRESTED FOR FRAUD AND TREASON?
I posted to Brett Baier’s Facebook at the time this News story was published - Even in this interpretation(right or wrong)Obama isn't eligible to be President of United States of America, as Obama's mother Ann was 5 months short of being 5 years a United States Citizen after her 14 years old birthday. Ann's birth November 29, 1942 - Obama's birth August 4 1961. - Fox News anchor declares Obama is eligible http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/fox-news-anchor-declares-obama-is-eligible/
These men and women above have it absolutely correct Natural Born is derived from birth by nature and cannot be removed by man or statute, if any law or man may remove citizenship or statute may define it, it is not natural born. I am Natural born and I can prove it. No man or law or statute or logic can remove this status from me, plain and simple. I am born a perfect and permanent citizen and nothing but my own free will can remove that status. This is not the status of Rubio or Obama they are inferior citizens by nature, too fxxking bad.
How could Brett Baier make a speech while is head up King Hussein's rectum?
“A natural born citizen is not dependent upon Congress passing a statute or the constitution being amended. A natural born citizen is a citizen of a specific nation by the law of nature of citizenship. The law of nature of national citizenship is written into the very nature of the universe of nation-states, and is universal as to place, uniform as to person, and fixed as to time. By definition the law governing natural born citizenship exists independent of any human power, legislative or otherwise. That is why “natural born citizenship” is not defined in the Constitution. Such citizenship exists whether recognized by positive law or not. Such citizenship is God-given. To qualify one must be born to a father and a mother each of whom is a citizen of a particular state in order for the person to be “natural born” citizen of that state.” - Herb Titus, Esq.
@daddynoz
The Fox commentator is utterly like his counterparts...someone who has, personally and professionally, taken no time to examine what many millions have.
The real problem lays with the owner/CEO, Rupert Murdoch, of Fox News and their top executives, and the rest of the owners and executives of the other major news organs. Only a handful of men control as to what is the "news." Paid news talkers like Brett Baier are on dog leashes and follow their bosses orders.
Hey, don't forget the great Constitutional scholars Michael Chertoff and Senator Patrick Leahy. Here is an excerpt from a ABC News article about John McCain:
"Earlier this month, Leahy asked Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff his views on the matter during a Judiciary Committee hearing.
"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff said.
Leahy concurred."
Link:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/04/legislation-int/
"ATTORNEYS GENERAL TOM HORNE, ARIZONA; PAM BONDI, FLORIDA; SAM OLENS, GEORGIA; BILL SCHUETTE, MICHIGAN; SCOTT PRUITT, OKLAHOMA; MARTY JACKLEY, SOUTH DAKOTA; ALAN WILSON, SOUTH CAROLINA; GREG ABBOTT, TEXAS; AND KEN CUCCINELLI OF VIRGINIA HAVE PRODUCED A JOINT MEMO ON MARCH 5TH, 2012 --- DETAILING 21 FLAGRANT & ILLEGAL VIOLATIONS OF LAW COMMITTED BY OBAMA AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION"
"By now it is unsurprising the media has by and large ignored this announcement, although AG Cuccinelli did appear in an extended segment with CSPAN (the relevant segment can be found here) on March 18th.
Fortunately, The Tea Party Tribune published the Attorney’s General memo,“A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law” in full the same day it was released. It is nothing short of a flashing legal headline story, yet cannot be found at the Washington Post or the New York Times.
“Whether it is through the EPA, NLRB, Office of Surface Mining, FCC or other entities, the Obama Administration has aggressively used administrative agencies to implement policy objectives that cannot gain congressional approval and are outside of the law.” – A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law -
Attorneys General Join Forces to Call Into Account Illegal Obama Administration Violations
http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/03/05/attorneys-general-join-forces-to-call-into-account-illegal-obama-administration-violations/
"We the People Demand a Full Scale Investigation into the Eligibility Requirements of President Obama to be President and to run again for a second term."
SIGN THE PETITION:
http://www.petition2congress.com/6251/we-peple-demand-full-scale-investigation-eligability-requirement/?src=widget
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"VIRGINIA AG: IF OBAMA'S MANDATE STANDS, THE GOV'T CAN ORDER YOU TO DO ANYTHING"
Source: CNSNews.com
By: Melanie Hunter
Posted: March 19th, 2012
“If the government can just order you to buy something, and fine you if you don’t” – the way the individual mandate of Obamacare requires every American to buy government-approved health insurance and fines them if they don’t comply – “they can order you to do anything,” Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli said during an appearance on C-SPAN’s “Newsmaker” on Sunday.
Cuccinelli, the first attorney general to file a lawsuit challenging Obamacare, said out of 16 judges that have heard the lawsuit so far, only one has ruled that the fine amounts to a tax."
...
“The centerpiece constitutional issue is the individual mandate – the requirement in the health care bill that every American buy government-approved health insurance, and this is done under the Commerce Clause. It is commonly talked about as the 10th Amendment – it is not a 10th Amendment case,” Cuccinelli said.
The question at hand, he said, is whether Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce allows them “compel you to buy health insurance.”
“And our side obviously says, No. The federal government says, ‘Yes.’ And there has never been a case like this ever before in the over 200 years since the Constitution was passed. The federal government has never compelled people to buy a product under the guise of regulating commerce,” Cuccinnell added.
He said when they filed their case against Obamacare on March 23, 2010, “it was all about the Commerce clause,” and the critics predicted that the federal government would win, “but as we just kept making our case – and ‘we’ here is all of the states that address the limited government side of this that said this is too much power for the federal government. As we just kept making the case, kept making the case, gradually, it became clear the other side began to get worried that they could lose.”
See The Entire Article Here:
http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/03/20/virginia-ag-if-obamas-mandate-stands-the-govt-can-order-you-to-do-anything/
@Anonymous
That only applies to a foreign birth.
Warning
Re-Education Camps for Political Activists Are Real!
http://www.infowars.com/re-education-camps-for-political-activists-are-real/
If Murdoch was truly a tycoon, he would demand a dicussion be aired.
It is to his benefit to change the attorney general & FCC czar & end their bogus harassment & investigation of his publishing & media acquisitions.
A new POTUS would stop funding the evil David brock at MEDIA MATTERS.
May 7, 2012
Mississippi Orly Taitz Obama Election Challenge: Discovery Halted
http://birtherheadlines.blogspot.com/2012/05/mississippi-orly-taitz-obama-election.html
Video/Audio: Rush Limbaugh Takes on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants
obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/05/rush-limbaugh-takes-on-obamas-social.html
AN EXCELLENT VIDEO - WORTH WATCHING & SHARING!!!
"WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CONSTITUTION????? - JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO" - (VIDEO)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sNWbiAMf80&feature=related
April 30, 2012
"THE SUBVERSIVE NETWORK TAKING OVER AMERICA"
By Wes Vernon
Excerpt:
"The time has long passed when we could afford to look the other way on the extent to which subversive influences — communist and jihad-oriented Islamists — have for years been worming their way into the high councils of our government.
So let's say this again: When the Cold War ended, the enemies of America did not just go away. America is under attack from Communists (with both a large and small "c") and Jihadists.
These two threats to America (by violent means if necessary) have philosophical differences, but they are bound together by an identical ultimate goal: a one-world dictatorship where they can rule forever by the threat of death for dissenters. Recall this column reported a meeting where supposedly "intellectual thinkers" seriously contemplated the incarceration of 100 million Americans and killing 25 million of them — all in order to complete the takeover. (See "Hollywood's red stripes" — 10/31/11.)
No congressional committee is investigating this threat to kill Americans and rule the world — a scandal in itself.
Priorities, please."
[...]
"Let there be no mistaking...
By any standard, the Communist/jihadist alliance is making great headway. There is reason to believe that this political pincer movement views an Obama victory in the fall as essential to its takeover goals.
Here is a glimpse of what we might expect if this president gets a green light from the voters:"
Continue To Read More Here:
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/vernon/120430
Two Comments Under The Above Article:
"Edward P Cox
The damage inflicted since the Communist Party assumed leadership of the Democratic Party is incalculable. Americans, primarily Democrats, are committing treason on a daily basis. Unless the American people wake up to this threat the country is doomed to the same fate as North Korea and Cuba.
April 30, 2012"
* * * * * * * * * *
"Hana Fiveo
Great article Mr. Vernon. Goes right along with why is the Dept of Homeland Security stock piling 450 million.40 cal bullets when they only have just over 21,000 enforcement agents and that's just for their Glock handguns. Got to wonder what the plan is.
http://conservativeminds.ning.com/profiles/blogs/a-bullet-for-each-american-citizen-oh-my
April 30, 2012"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
April 26, 2012
"TRICKLE DOWN TYRANNY: CRUSHING THE RUSH TO THE POLICE STATE (BEFORE THE TRICKLE BECOMES AN ONSLAUGHT)"
By Wes Vernon
Excerpt:
"In "Trickle Down Tyranny: Crushing Obama's Dream of the Socialist States of America," the author makes the case that — unlike Obama's 43 predecessors (good and bad) who merely made mistakes — this president is suspect of deliberately attempting to bring down the United States.
Back To Basics
"The next president must love America" is Savage's premise. He believes — literally and beyond campaign rhetoric — that our country cannot survive another four years of Obama. Though this tome fulfills the take-no-prisoners expectations of "Savage Nation" fans, the author's point is about far more than verbal rock-throwing.
"Trickle-Down Tyranny" is crammed with fact after fact and, more to the point, many instances of "connecting the dots," some with frightening scenarios. Mr. Savage cites multiple small steps that, when taken together, lend some credence to his comparison of the current administration to Hitler's step-by-step takeover of Nazi Germany. "The parallels," he writes, 'are so disturbing.'"
Continue To Read More Here:
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/vernon/120426
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
While we get caught up in the constitutional question, we seem to be ignoring the fact that Obama's lawyer apparentely admitted Obama's birth certificate is a forgery in a NJ court. The republicans may be waiting until after the democratic convention before bringing it up so Mitt won't have to run against Hillary, nor risk Romney also being disqualified on "natural born citizen" His father George who apparently never got naturalized in US after returning from Mexico.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.