Orly v Obot: Did Government Default in Taitz v Astrue
Obama Connecticut Social Security Number Appeal?
Dr. Taitz is reporting the government has defaulted in the Taitz v. Astrue appeal dealing with Obama's social security number reserved for Connecticut applicants. We don't claim to be attorneys and don't know who is right in regards to the claims made by both Dr. Taitz and the Obot. But the court rules and procedures are listed at the DC Court of Appeals website for anyone to read.
Let us know what you find. The complicit media sure won't. Previous reports on the Taitz v Astrue case can be read here.
---------------------------------------------------
Dr. Taitz: Obama regime is in default on Obama’s fraudulent use of CT Social Security number. More tampering by the clerk of the court
As you can see by the docket the Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue was supposed to file a response to my reciprocal motion for Summary judgment in favor of the Appellant. they were supposed to answer by March 29th. They are a month late.
Last week I filed a request for the clerk of the court to post a default. I checked by the certified mail number, it was received by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week. I addressed it to the clerk managing my case Ken Mathis. I called him today, he was extremely rude, refused to listen and hang up the phone on me. I called the second time and asked to talk to the Chief Clerk. I was told that the Chief clerk is not available. I asked to leave a message. I left a recorded phone message for the Chief Clerk Mark J. Langer. I need my supporters to call the Chief Clerk and the managing judge. I am seeing the same tampering with the case as I saw in other courts. This is the same pattern. I also complained about the fact that the clerk on his own accord decided not to grant my motion for ECF filing, which would have made my filing automatic. It is clear that the clerks are manipulating this court as well.
---------------------------------------------------
The Obot: Orly has asked for a default judgment in her Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit. Astrue had filed a motion for summary affirmance and Orly had asked for extra time to respond. She eventually managed to respond on 03/16/2012. In addition to her opposition, she also filed what was interpreted to be a motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellant and the Appellee had failed to respond. But, apparently unbeknownst to Orly, the Court’s rules allow for 45 days for such a motion to be filed, where the time starts at the date of docketing of the appeal. The appeal was filed on 10/31/2011, so do the math… Orly was, as is so typical, late in the filing of her own motion for summary judgment, although a more proper filing would haven been a motion for summary reversal but such motions are rarely granted. Orly is so clueless when it comes to following the rules of the Courts…
Of course, there is no requirement to respond to such a motion, as the Courts can establish whether or not the case meets the strict requirements and Orly has failed to provide much of any argument that would allow for a summary reversal.
The Court will rule on the motion for summary affirmance, and likely accept the motion as there is really nothing else the Court could do.
Peavey v. Holder, No. 09-5389, 2010 WL 3155823 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 9, 2010) (per curiam). The court grants agencies’ motion for summary affirmance where “[a]ppellant has not demonstrated that any agency ‘improperly withheld’ a record within its possession” and “the district court correctly concluded that the agencies conducted searches reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.”
But even accepting Orly’s filing, there is really no such a thing as default judgment in an appeal’s court. At best one can ask for a motion for summary affirmance, or, summary reversal, where the latter one is rarely granted. Such a motion would merely return the case to the lower court.
---------------------------------------------------
The court rules and procedures found at the DC Court of Appeals website provided below. Please let us know what you find...
http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL%20-%20RPP%20-%20Circuit%20Rules/$FILE/RulesDecember2011LINKSandBOOKMARKS4.pdf
http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL%20-%20RPP%20-%20Handbook%202006%20Rev%202007/$FILE/HandbookDecember2011WITHTOCLINKS22.pdf
Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Piece on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants - DETAILS HERE: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/private-investigators-respond-to-snopes.html
HD VIDEO FROM 3/31 TEA PARTY EVENT WITH SHERIFF JOE POSTED HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html
-WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html -
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration
New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...
New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...
34 comments:
One thing is for sure- Orly un-masks a lot of people in her wake.
They don't need to contest it, because she is working off of false information.
How many times now has Orly falsely claimed that "the defense is in default" and "I am entitled to summary judgment"?
Every single time she didn't get the rules right, or was wrong because she hadn't properly served the defendant.
Why would it be different now?
I looked at the court rules and didn't see anything about a default. So how can Orly have a default when the rules don't provide for that?
Ms. Taitz never seems to learn her craft. She does not ever want to learn the proper rules and procedures ofthe court and when they deny her requests she screams conspiracy.
It is really sad that one would think after all these cases she still cannot get the basic Civil Rule of Procedure down.
The clerk cannot enter a default order only the Courts can. Writing a letter to the Clerks office is inccorrect. She would need to file a Motion for a Default with the Court.
Without looking into the case there is avery good chance that she did not properly serve anyone on this case. Proper service IS not a certified letter but the retaining of a process server
Her mistake are always on very basic stuff. It is not a conspiracy. The clerks and the courts are holding her to the same rules and standards that EVERY attorney is held to.
@Anonymous 7:13
In the Georgia Ballot Access Hearing two other attorneys legitimately claimed "the defense is in default" and "I am entitled to summary judgement", and the result was the same.
In every single case, whether Orly has been involved or not, the result has been the same.
Why desparage Orly but not every other attorney?
"Birthers" were put on notice way back in 2008, when Judge Carter, a former Marine who promised to hear the case on its merits, dismissed the case two days after a law clerk with ties to Obama was suddenly appointed to him.
The Georgia Ballot Access Hearing was the final nail in the coffin -- Obama defied the Judge's explicit order to appear and the Judge defied Georgia's explicit election law putting the burden of proof on Obama.
another obot lie
tell that to thousands of people who don't show up or respond to default judgement hearings to find out that the judge ruled against them, and they owe whatever the creditor demands.
obots are spin and twisters.
Here is a question. Since Obama has been elected, has Orly actually been using her website donations explicitly for these lawsuits/ballot challenges OR has the actual plan been a preplaned scheme all along to collect donations specifically to fill her campaign chest to run against Dianne Feinstein?
RacerJim said...
- In the Georgia Ballot Access Hearing two other attorneys legitimately claimed "the defense is in default" and "I am entitled to summary judgement", and the result was the same.
Judge Malihi had no power to enter a "default judgment" nor was that what he offered, which, BTW, the defense turned down what he did offer.
- In every single case, whether Orly has been involved or not, the result has been the same.
Simply because there's been no one entitled to a default.
- Why desparage Orly but not every other attorney?
This article is about Orly's nonsensical proclomation that she's entitled to a default...she's not.
- "Birthers" were put on notice way back in 2008, when Judge Carter, a former Marine who promised to hear the case on its merits, dismissed the case two days after a law clerk with ties to Obama was suddenly appointed to him.
I can't believe (well, I can, considering the source) that this birther lie continues. Judge Carter never promised to hear the case on the merits, as birthers claim that term, as in a full-blown trial. He did hold hearings and made a determination on the merits.
- The Georgia Ballot Access Hearing was the final nail in the coffin -- Obama defied the Judge's explicit order to appear and the Judge defied Georgia's explicit election law putting the burden of proof on Obama.
Another lie. (and not the first time you've posted it). There was never any Order for Obama to appear anywhere and do anything in the GA hearing.
No, as confirmed by the GA Supreme Court, GA law was upheld.
As to Orly's claim in this case that the government is in default, it's complete and total BS. It's merely another example of her continuing and complete lack of understanding of anything to do with legal procedure and the law.
@Anonymous
apples and oranges.
There will not be and can not be a "default judgment" in the Asture case... period.
Judge Malihi had no power to enter a "default judgment" nor was that what he offered, which, BTW, the defense turned down what he did offer.
>>>wow, what a mouthful. First you say he didn't offer it, then you say he did. Typical obot liberal twist, spin, obstruction, obfuscation. Couldn't be a more clear example on this board by any other obot poster. Read it ten times, and you will see.
Simply because there's been no one entitled to a default.
>>>oh really, tell that to thousands of people who fail to show up and defend themselves in any court in this nation.
This article is about Orly's nonsensical proclomation that she's entitled to a default...she's not.
>>>>REally, based on what? Orly responded, and she said there is no law saying she not, and she even spoke to the court about it, and they said that the judge would make a decision on her request.
I can't believe (well, I can, considering the source) that this birther lie continues.>>>>A 9 year old could see that obama's birth certificate was a fake, therefore you are either blind or mentally challenged. Even supreme court justice Waite defined a natural born citizen, as well as Patrick Leahy. Obama fails on both accounts. It's no lie, it is based upon historical precedent, law, and even US CODE. Which you obviously know nothing about. Futhermore, would George Washington have turned over the presidency to a British subject??? I think not. And the fact that Washington changed "citizen" to 'natural born citizen" is one , other ,reason for the definition which OBAMA fails to meet. Then there is the matter of his grandmother, among other, witnesses to birth in Kenya. The many missing records and information. Bill Ayers postman saying he met a foreign exchange student named Obama. Obama's passport information missing. Obama's selective service application , a fake. His SSN a fake. Too many "coincidences" to be believable? I think not. Any thinking person with reason can see there is a major problem here. Except you blind obots, of course. Liberalism = mental disorder, after all, right?
1. I did not see a law stating that the presiding judge cannot issue a default in the court of Appeals
as a matter of fact I called the court and inquired and was told that the judges will decide
2. Obama’s administration and specifically commissioner of the Social security Administration were ordered to respond by March 29th. Not only they are in default, they are in a clear contempt of the court order. This is the same situation as we’ve seen in FA, where the presiding judge denied Obama’s motion to quash my subpoena and Obama had to appear i court and provide certified copies of all of the documents that I demanded in the subpoena. He did not show up, his attorney did not show up. If it would be me or you or any other citizen the judge would have held him in contempt of court and could issue a warrant for his arrest. Recently a cancer surviver in Illinois was thrown in prison because she did not show up for a hearing regarding a $281 medical bill, which she was previously told, she does not owe.
We clearly have a rule of tyranny. We have a political ruling elite- laws do not apply to them. They are above the law. And then there are the rest of us- 311 million American citizens, who work day and night and pay taxes through the nose in order for those freeloading scoundrels of the ruling elite to gain millions on our backs and spit in our faces.
It is time for the laws to apply to this criminal Obama, as they apply to everybody else. He is using a forgery instead of a valid birth certificate and a stolen CT Social Security number, which was never assigned to him. The court needs to hold Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Michael Astrue accountable for flagrant contempt of court and order him to produce immediately the SS5 application for CT Social Security number 042-68-4425 that this criminal Barack Hussein Obama is fraudulently using according to e-verify and according to SSNVS
"Judge Malihi had no power to enter a "default judgment" nor was that what he offered, which, BTW, the defense turned down what he did offer.
>>>wow, what a mouthful. First you say he didn't offer it, then you say he did. Typical obot liberal twist, spin, obstruction, obfuscation. Couldn't be a more clear example on this board by any other obot poster. Read it ten times, and you will see."
Talk about twisting... he did not offer a "default judgment." He did not have the power to do so. He did offer a default (not the same thing) and they refused.
"This article is about Orly's nonsensical proclomation that she's entitled to a default...she's not.
>>>>REally, based on what? Orly responded, and she said there is no law saying she not, and she even spoke to the court about it, and they said that the judge would make a decision on her request.
"
Based on the fact that there's no provision in the rules for a default judgment in the appeals court. It's that simple.
Yes, I'm sure they told her they would make a decision, but it won't be to grant her a default. Even if it were a provision in law, they are not in default.
"I can't believe (well, I can, considering the source) that this birther lie continues.>>>>A 9 year old could see that obama's birth certificate was a fake, therefore you are either blind or mentally challenged. Even supreme court justice Waite defined a natural born citizen, as well as Patrick Leahy. Obama fails on both accounts. It's no lie, it is based upon historical precedent, law, and even US CODE. Which you obviously know nothing about. Futhermore, would George Washington have turned over the presidency to a British subject??? I think not. And the fact that Washington changed "citizen" to 'natural born citizen" is one , other ,reason for the definition which OBAMA fails to meet. Then there is the matter of his grandmother, among other, witnesses to birth in Kenya. The many missing records and information. Bill Ayers postman saying he met a foreign exchange student named Obama. Obama's passport information missing. Obama's selective service application , a fake. His SSN a fake. Too many "coincidences" to be believable? I think not. Any thinking person with reason can see there is a major problem here. Except you blind obots, of course. Liberalism = mental disorder, after all, right?"
All complete bullshit. Courts will continue (as 5 recently have) to say otherwise re nbc. But I'm sure that's only because birthers and 3-4 birther "lawyers" know the law better than anyone in history.
@Anonymous
Orly didn't see a law?
STOP THE PRESSES!! That's a real revelation.
Orly filed a FOIA request.
it was denied.
She filed an appeal to the USDC D.C.
The agency decision was upheld.
She appealed to the D.C. Court of Appeal.
The agency filed a Motion for Summary Affirmance.
Orly, after obtaining an extension of time) filed an opposition to the motion. In it she included what she called a Motion for Summary Judgment (for which there is no basis in law).
In the docket the date for any reply the agency wished to make was set out (they are neither obligated nor were they ordered to reply).
Because they chose to stand on their original papers and not file a reply, Orly believes they are in default. They are not.
She then sent a letter requesting a default judgment be entered (rather than filing a proper motion) not that it would matter.
They are not in default. Orly is wrong, as usual.
She might make a good political activist but she can't lawyer her way out of a paper bag.
can't lawyer her way out of a paper bag
OR EVEN A WET PAPER BAG!
Bari Malik Shabazz is payback for Bushy being "selected" and not "elected." Turnabout is fair play I guess.
Still a coup d'etat no matter how you slice it, and we're stuck like chuck.
Can you say, ROMNEYWORLD?
All complete bullshit
>>>the only thing i see here that is complete bullshit is your post, obot. Take your lies elsewhere
I can't believe (well, I can, considering the source) that this birther lie continues.>>>>A 9 year old could see that obama's birth certificate was a fake, therefore you are either blind or mentally challenged. Even supreme court justice Waite defined a natural born citizen, as well as Patrick Leahy. Obama fails on both accounts. It's no lie, it is based upon historical precedent, law, and even US CODE. Which you obviously know nothing about. Futhermore, would George Washington have turned over the presidency to a British subject??? I think not. And the fact that Washington changed "citizen" to 'natural born citizen" is one , other ,reason for the definition which OBAMA fails to meet. Then there is the matter of his grandmother, among other, witnesses to birth in Kenya. The many missing records and information. Bill Ayers postman saying he met a foreign exchange student named Obama. Obama's passport information missing. Obama's selective service application , a fake. His SSN a fake. Too many "coincidences" to be believable? I think not. Any thinking person with reason can see there is a major problem here. Except you blind obots, of course. Liberalism = mental disorder, after all, right?"
All complete bullshit
>>>>prove it.
"Liberalism = mental disorder, after all, right?"
No, I'd change "Liberalism" to "birthers."
Meanwhile, Orly is calling radio shows under an assumed name and hanging up on the hosts when they figure out who she is: http://praiseindy.com/1608251/notorious-anti-obama-birther-orly-taitz-calls-black-radio-talkshow-to-denounce-president-obama-and-indianas-gop-secretary-of-state/
@Anonymous
LENA!! LOL
Amos Brown is not taking Orly's indescribably rude and dishonest behavior lying down. He's tweeting the national media about it. Obots are gleefully forwarding it to media too. This HUGE misstep of Orly's will hit the national media in the next few days.
And some of you people GAVE HER MONEY? LOLOLOLOLOL
There's no predicting Orly. Just when you think she couldn't do anything worse, she does. Every. Single. Time.
Go ahead and read the ruling on her Taitz v. Dunn case and see how many times she screwed that case up--the Court lists them all. She lost if anyone was wondering. TAITZ-v-DUNN-APPEAL-2012-05-01-Opinion-Affirmed-in-Full
Never in a MILLION yrs would I have guessed that we would one day seriously consider an admited "OBOT'S" reasoning over the Lady's.
More typical ORYR crap.
Everyone is free to file their own case.
If you are smarter than Orly, then FILE YOUR OWN CASE..! Untill then, you're just another SPINELESS, GUTLESS, COWARD..!
God Bless and keep Orly and her family.
@Commy... "Never in a MILLION yrs would I have guessed that we would one day seriously consider an admited "OBOT'S" reasoning over the Lady's."
You somehow seem to ignore that as to Orly's "cases" those "Obots" are correct in their summaries and predictions and outcome every. single. time. (well, as well as all the others, 123 to date, but this is about Orly). It's not that difficult. None of them are if you actually know the law.
Below is exactly the summary of the Astrue appeal, and she not only will not get a default judgment (because there's no basis for it in law) she will lose the appeal. Then you can just scream corrupt court rather than accepting reality.
"Orly filed a FOIA request.
it was denied.
She filed an appeal to the USDC D.C.
The agency decision was upheld.
She appealed to the D.C. Court of Appeal.
The agency filed a Motion for Summary Affirmance.
Orly, after obtaining an extension of time) filed an opposition to the motion. In it she included what she called a Motion for Summary Judgment (for which there is no basis in law).
In the docket the date for any reply the agency wished to make was set out (they are neither obligated nor were they ordered to reply).
Because they chose to stand on their original papers and not file a reply, Orly believes they are in default. They are not.
She then sent a letter requesting a default judgment be entered (rather than filing a proper motion) not that it would matter.
They are not in default. Orly is wrong, as usual.
She might make a good political activist but she can't lawyer her way out of a paper bag."
> The Georgia Ballot Access Hearing was the final nail in the coffin -- Obama defied the Judge's explicit order to appear
No, he didn't because there was no "explicit order".
All the judge did was deny Obama's motion to dismiss.
That's a far cry from "explicit order to appear" (he can always send his lawyer).
Second, Orly had issued a "subpoena" for him to appear. Now we don't need to talk about whether that was proper or not, all we need to see is that Orly failed to file a motion to enforce the subpoena.
Instead she falsely claims that her subpoena is enough to "find Obama in contempt of court" and "award her the victory". False as it gets.
Don't you Orly lovers ever ever wonder why she makes such elementary mistakes, time and time again?
She could've nailed Obama a dozen times and always failed. Why?
Now her latest case was ripe for going forward, she even had a special judge assigned to her case, now she torpedoed it by turning it into a RICO (read: federal) case.
Why oh why is she doing this?
And no, the other lawyers weren't yet in a position to do better, mostly because Orly has already poisoned the well enough to thwart all further attempts by others.
It's called "deliberately creating adverse precedent", tactics used by many big companies by suing a collusive defendant who loses on purpose to create precedent for the big company.
Orly has been playing you from day one and you Orly lovers follow her like she's the Second Coming. Amazing.
-She might make a good political activist but
she can't lawyer her way out of a paper bag.
-Orly has been playing you from day one and you Orly lovers follow her like she's the Second Coming. Amazing.
Another SPINELESS COWARD that's SMARTER than Orly yet has filed ZERO CASES. Right out of the DEANO FORESKIN School of Law.
ZERO CASES = NO LEGAL SAVY
File a case, or get out of the way of those who have the BALLS to..!
MUST SEE OUTSTANDING VIDEO!!!
"ATTORNEY GENERAL: OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE THE GREATEST SET OF LAW-BREAKERS IN OUR LIFETIMES!!!"
"REPORTS 21 SPECIFIC LAW VIOLATIONS!!! "THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!" VIDEO
March 8, 2012
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
"This pResident and his administration in my view represent the greatest set of law-breakers that have run the federal government in our lifetimes.
The fact is, pResident Obama and his appointee's have ignored federal laws, they've ignored binding rulings of federal courts, and they've ignored the limits on their power mandated by the Constitution."
Lou Dobbs: [...] "What is going on? [...] What is the recourse that you hope to achieve here?"
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
"Well, there's two things going on here. We compiled all of these violations of the law that we're all contending with around the country, to make the point that American's need to understand fully what's at stake in November, if they choose to vote to re-elect this pResident.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S AT STAKE - IS THE RULE OF LAW ITSELF. 'Cause I wasn't kidding with the statement that you ran there before, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LEVEL OF LAW-BREAKING IN THIS ADMINISTRATION.
THESE AREN'T JUST DISPUTES ABOUT, "Well you see it one way, and we see it another way." For instance, take the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission went into try to regulate the Internet.
A COURT TOLD THEM IN AN ORDER, "You don't have the authority to do that." They went back in the same year and said, "Well, we're going to do it anyway!!!!!" IN THE FACE OF A COURT ORDER THAT THEY DIDN'T APPEAL!!!!!!!!!!
These are "the pResident's" appointee's!!!!!
In that instance, it isn't just their opinion versus some other lawyer, in my case an attorney general, IT'S -- A COURT HAS RULED, AND THEY HAVE IGNORED THE RULING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And so now some private parties are going back to court with them over that. WE'RE GOING TO HELP THOSE PRIVATE PARTIES FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE TO RE-ESTABLISH THE RULES OF LAW THERE.
We can rattle off examples from the EPA which I've taken to calling the "Employment Prevention Agency" because they're so good at that, BUT THEY HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW.
THESE ARE NOT POLICY DIFFERENCES, THESE ARE VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW. And the pResident has created a corporate culture in his administration, that is very comfortable not merely pushing the boundaries, but completely trampling them, be they constitutional or legal."
Lou Dobb: [...] "[T]he assault on religious freedom initiated by this administration [...]. THIS IS REMARKABLE FOR ANY ADMINISTRATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccellini:
"IT IS TRULY UNPRECEDENTED. People are used to hearing hyperbole in election years. The numbers don't lie. I mean just in the report we compiled there were over 20 violations of the law, [of "Obama" and his administration] and just last week, Virginia and Texas were in the DC Circuit Court Of Appeals here, on behalf of 15 states [...].
[...] [A]nd the EPA came in and said, "OH NO, YOU'RE GOING TO DO IT OUR WAY, OR NO WAY!!" AND THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE KNOCKED THEM BACK. THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW OVER AND OVER IN STATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY."
Lou Dobbs: "As always, It is good talking with you. We appreciate it."
MUST SEE VIDEO:
http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/03/08/lou-dobbs-report-details-21-legal-violations-by-obama-admin/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I don't support Orly anymore. Won't send any more money. She is an incompetent lawyer. Now she lives to attack this site and Wnd. She is a nutcase. So unprofessional.
-I don't support Orly anymore. Won't send any more money. She is an incompetent lawyer. Now she lives to attack this site and Wnd. She is a nutcase. So unprofessional.
Well you can thank the good folk on this website for that.
Good Riddance. Now you can start sending your money to ORYR, Haskins, WND, and Joe and his CCP. I hear they're gonna have another PRESSER soon, and I'm sure you'll be very happy there... Hell if you live in CA. you can even vote for Feinstein. In short like the BRILLIANT Legal Commentators here who POST UNDER ANON, KNOW MORE LAW THAN ORLY AND HAVENT AND AREN'T GOING TO "EVER" FILE A SINGLE CASE, you can do everything in your power to BRING THE LADY DOWN. Your previous post is a good start...
-Amos Brown is not taking Orly's indescribably rude and dishonest behavior lying down. He's tweeting the national media about it. Obots are gleefully forwarding it to media too. This HUGE misstep of Orly's will hit the national media in the next few days.
And some of you people GAVE HER MONEY? LOLOLOLOLOL
Amos Brown..?! Really..?! You mean that Black Racist Sack o Shit that considers Bozo Legit and considers you a KOOK for pointing out that he's a FREAKING FRAUD..?! That Amos..?
I think you should make him your Leader from now on. Listen to him daily and hang on his every word. Put your faith on the SYSTEM and let the GOV. help you out..!
I can guarantee, YOU voted for Bozo in 08... LOLOLOLOLOL
Re: "Obama defied the Judge's explicit order to appear..."
NO. There was never an order to appear. There was only a birther lawyer who said that the judge had issued such an order.
@Anonymous"Go ahead and read the ruling on her Taitz v. Dunn case and see how many times she screwed that case up--the Court lists them all. She lost if anyone was wondering. TAITZ-v-DUNN-APPEAL-2012-05-01-Opinion-Affirmed-in-Full"
Hardly - if the court listed them all, the opinion would be as thick as Vattel's Law of Nations.
Well, you got your answer on Orly's default today.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.